MEDIA ADVISORY: Justice Centre appears before Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage to testify re: Charter impact of M-103

Share this:

MEDIA ADVISORY: Justice Centre appears before Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage to testify re: Charter impact of M-103

Share this:

OTTAWA: The Justice Centre will appear before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Wednesday, September 27, to explain the potential impact of Bill M-103 (“Systemic racism and religious discrimination”) on Charter rights.

The Justice Centre’s Litigation Director, Jay Cameron, will appear before the Standing Committee between 3:30 P.M. and 5:30 P.M. in the Wellington Building, room 415.  Other witnesses include Fr. Raymond J. de Souza, Canadian Council of Imams, Council for Muslims Facing Tomorrow, and International Christian Voice.

On March 23rd 2017, the Canadian House of Commons passed M-103, a non-binding Motion that condemns religious discrimination, while particularly highlighting “Islamophobia”. The term “Islamophobia” is not defined in the Motion.

As outlined in its Brief to Parliament, the Justice Centre writes:

Attempting to “completely eliminate racism and religious discrimination including “Islamophobia” in Canada’s multicultural society would require government oppression and control of not only speech and expression, but thought itself. In proposing to eliminate racism, discrimination and “Islamophobia”, the government necessarily makes itself the sole arbiter of what constitutes those things, and tasks itself with their elimination. If M-103 is legislatively codified, the unconstitutional infringement of freedom of thought, belief, expression and religion is inevitable.

The Justice Centre will make three key observations to the Committee:

  1. The Motion is vague and lacks the certainty for proper legislative recommendations.
  2. The state has no business in attempting to control the minds and thoughts of its citizens, as is implicitly proposed by the Motion – the Charter stands as a guardian between the citizen and oppressive state action.
  3. The term “Islamophobia,” interpreted to mean an “irrational fear of Islam,” is not capable of legislative prevention.

Share this:

Crown appeal against acquitted peaceful protestor Evan Blackman back in court June 19

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a hearing date for Evan Blackman's summary conviction appeal has...

Protests Must Be Handled Under the Rule of Law, Not Politics

John Carpay - The Epoch Times In the so-called Gaza “encampment movement,” as the media has dubbed it, pro-Palestine protesters have...

Nova Scotia’s New Privacy-Violating Law Invites a Court Challenge

John Carpay - The Epoch Times Why does the Nova Scotia government need access to the individual medical records of every...

Explore Related News

may3-NR
Read More
iStock-187077158
Read More
Brisco
Read More
may3-NR
iStock-187077158
Brisco
jk
Explore Further