Supreme Court of Nova Scotia grants group of doctors and patients the right to challenge health privacy law

Share this:

Nova Scotia Supreme Court (Courtesy of Rosemarie Mosteller)
Nova Scotia Supreme Court (Courtesy of Rosemarie Mosteller)

Supreme Court of Nova Scotia grants group of doctors and patients the right to challenge health privacy law

Nova Scotia Supreme Court (Courtesy of Rosemarie Mosteller)
Nova Scotia Supreme Court (Courtesy of Rosemarie Mosteller)

Share this:

HALIFAX, NS: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia has granted public interest standing to a group of physicians and patients, represented by lawyers funded through the Justice Centre, in a major constitutional challenge to the province’s Personal Health Information Act. 

The ruling allows the applicants to proceed with their Charter challenge of recent amendments that force doctors and other healthcare providers to disclose patients’ private medical information to government officials without consent. 

The amendments, introduced in 2024 through the province’s Financial Measures Act, authorize the Minister of Health and Wellness to obtain identifiable medical records for three broad purposes: planning and managing the healthcare system, allocating resources, and creating or maintaining electronic health record programs. The government plans to build a centralized electronic database containing the personal medical histories of all Nova Scotians. 

The applicants argue these amendments violate Charter sections 7 and 8, which protect liberty, security of the person, and the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure. They argue that the law erodes informed consent and medical confidentiality, cornerstones of patient trust. 

Constitutional lawyer Chris Fleury remarked, “Health care records contain some of the most private and personal details of an individual’s life. Health records deserve the highest level of protection from the intrusion of the state.” 

In her ruling, Justice Denise Boudreau affirmed that the applicants’ challenge raises a serious constitutional issue and serves the public interest.  

The Court found that the applicants, including physicians and patients, have a genuine and legitimate interest in the matter and that their case represents a reasonable and effective way to bring the issue before the Court.

The case will now proceed to a full hearing on the constitutionality of the amendments to the Personal Health Information Act. 

Share this:

Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)

Alberta lawyer asks Court of Appeal to consider excluded arguments in challenge to Law Society rules

CALGARY, AB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that Alberta lawyer Roger Song has asked the Court of Appeal of...
External view of Kamloops Indian Residential School (Courtesy of Wikipedia)

Western Standard: The real threat isn’t residential school ‘denialism’ — it’s censorship

On June 1, the Senate Human Rights Committee passed an amendment to Bill C-9, the Combatting Hate Act, that would make...
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)

Can private conversations lead to human rights penalties? BC court to decide

ABBOTSFORD, BC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will appear before...

Explore Related News

Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)
Read More
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)
Read More
Journalist Cory Morgan adjacent to a public highway (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Read More
Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)
Journalist Cory Morgan adjacent to a public highway (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Aqnus)