Mandatory masking requirements represent an interference with personal autonomy

Share this:

Mandatory masking requirements represent an interference with personal autonomy

Share this:

 

The Justice Centre is closely watching the development of orders and regulations which mandate the use of masks in indoor public places and which require private establishments to enforce this directive.

For example, as of June 30, 2020, the Ontario government had resisted calls from some city mayors to impose a province-wide order requiring masks in all indoor spaces.

Mandatory masking is an interference with personal autonomy. For some people they are far more than a momentary inconvenience during a quick trip to the grocery store. For those who must wear them for hours on end, those with respiratory illnesses and those with conditions such as claustrophobia and PTSD, masks can be debilitating and even a threat to health. Some of the orders instituted regionally in Ontario fail to fully account for the rights of those who cannot wear a mask safely. Such failings would render the requirements unconstitutional as a result of unjustified violations of sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, namely the rights to liberty, security of the person, and equality.

In addition, the necessity for exempt persons to disclose private and confidential information to third parties by way of explanation to justify their inability to wear a mask creates privacy concerns which may render the mandatory mask requirements illegal.

As noted by Health Canada , the Center for Disease Control (US) and the World Health Organization, and as noted by the Justice Centre in our report Unprecedented and Unjustified: A Charter Analysis of Ontario’s Response to COVID-19 and No longer demonstrably justified: An Analysis of Alberta’s COVID-19 Modelling the data shows that for the vast majority of the population under 65 years old, COVID-19 is not life threatening.

We also note that Health Canada and the WHO recommend against mandatory mask wearing in circumstances where social distancing is possible. The WHO notes, “At the present time, the widespread use of masks everywhere is not supported by high-quality scientific evidence, and there are potential benefits and harms to consider.”

The Justice Centre continues to monitor developments regarding orders and regulations that impose the wearing of masks upon citizens.

Share this:

Matt and Nicole Alexander (Courtesy of the Alexander family)

Ontario teachers’ conscience rights case returns to Labour Relations Board

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will return to...
Quebec City Convention Centre (Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)

Quebec government faces trial over cancelled Christian musical event

QUEBEC CITY, QC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the trial in Harvest Ministries International v. Quebec...
Couple discussing finances (Courtesy of SPD)

Epoch Times: The Proposed ‘Protecting Victims Act’ Goes Too Far

Benjamin Franklin wrote 250 years ago that “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and...

Explore Related News

Matt and Nicole Alexander (Courtesy of the Alexander family)
Read More
Quebec City Convention Centre (Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)
Read More
Cory Morgan (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Read More
Matt and Nicole Alexander (Courtesy of the Alexander family)
Quebec City Convention Centre (Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)
Cory Morgan (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Brian Jenkins wearing a sandwich board reading “Let us pray for the end of abortion" (Courtesy of Brian Jenkins)