Mandatory masking requirements represent an interference with personal autonomy

Share this:

Mandatory masking requirements represent an interference with personal autonomy

Share this:

 

The Justice Centre is closely watching the development of orders and regulations which mandate the use of masks in indoor public places and which require private establishments to enforce this directive.

For example, as of June 30, 2020, the Ontario government had resisted calls from some city mayors to impose a province-wide order requiring masks in all indoor spaces.

Mandatory masking is an interference with personal autonomy. For some people they are far more than a momentary inconvenience during a quick trip to the grocery store. For those who must wear them for hours on end, those with respiratory illnesses and those with conditions such as claustrophobia and PTSD, masks can be debilitating and even a threat to health. Some of the orders instituted regionally in Ontario fail to fully account for the rights of those who cannot wear a mask safely. Such failings would render the requirements unconstitutional as a result of unjustified violations of sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, namely the rights to liberty, security of the person, and equality.

In addition, the necessity for exempt persons to disclose private and confidential information to third parties by way of explanation to justify their inability to wear a mask creates privacy concerns which may render the mandatory mask requirements illegal.

As noted by Health Canada , the Center for Disease Control (US) and the World Health Organization, and as noted by the Justice Centre in our report Unprecedented and Unjustified: A Charter Analysis of Ontario’s Response to COVID-19 and No longer demonstrably justified: An Analysis of Alberta’s COVID-19 Modelling the data shows that for the vast majority of the population under 65 years old, COVID-19 is not life threatening.

We also note that Health Canada and the WHO recommend against mandatory mask wearing in circumstances where social distancing is possible. The WHO notes, “At the present time, the widespread use of masks everywhere is not supported by high-quality scientific evidence, and there are potential benefits and harms to consider.”

The Justice Centre continues to monitor developments regarding orders and regulations that impose the wearing of masks upon citizens.

Share this:

Kamloops Indian Residential School, 1930 (Courtesy of Deschatelets NDC Richelieu)

Western Standard: False claims and race-based laws undermine reconciliation

Truth and reconciliation are goals worth pursuing. Which is why all Canadians, whether Aboriginal or non-Aboriginal, should not settle for the...
Red key with text banned (Courtesy of C Mork)

Epoch Times: New Hate Crime Bill Criminalizes Feelings and Restricts Free Speech

Canada’s Criminal Code should punish bad behaviour, not bad feelings. Canadians need protection from crime, not from offensive opinions that...
Porch cameras installed by Dan Myles (Courtesy of Dan Myles)

City of Hamilton warned that its Fortification Bylaw banning doorbell and security cameras is unconstitutional

HAMILTON, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a warning letter has been sent to the...

Explore Related News

Porch cameras installed by Dan Myles (Courtesy of Dan Myles)
Read More
Chris Barber's truck, "Big Red" (Courtesy of Chris Barber)
Read More
Public meeting (Courtesy of Wideonet)
Read More
Porch cameras installed by Dan Myles (Courtesy of Dan Myles)
Chris Barber's truck, "Big Red" (Courtesy of Chris Barber)
Public meeting (Courtesy of Wideonet)
Dr. Frances Widdowson (Courtesy of Dr. Widdowson)