Alberta Court of Appeal shields “safe spaces” law from Charter challenge

Share this:

Dr. Frances Widdowson (Courtesy of Dr. Widdowson)
Dr. Frances Widdowson (Courtesy of Dr. Widdowson)

Alberta Court of Appeal shields “safe spaces” law from Charter challenge

Dr. Frances Widdowson (Courtesy of Dr. Widdowson)
Dr. Frances Widdowson (Courtesy of Dr. Widdowson)

Share this:

CALGARY, AB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Alberta Court of Appeal has dismissed a challenge by Dr. Frances Widdowson and Jonah Pickle, upholding the lower court’s refusal to permit a constitutional challenge to Alberta’s Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) “safe spaces” provisions.

The applicants had sought to challenge OHSA’s “harassment” and “psychological safety” mandates, which compel employers to police workplace speech under threat of fines or imprisonment. However, with today’s ruling, those provisions are immune from Charter scrutiny.

The case stemmed from the University of Lethbridge’s 2023 decision to cancel Dr. Widdowson’s lecture, How Woke-ism Threatens Academic Freedom. Despite the cancellation, Dr. Widdowson attempted to speak on campus but was drowned out by hundreds of protesting students and faculty. She and student, Mr. Jonah Pickle, later filed a constitutional challenge with lawyers funded by the Justice Centre, arguing that the University’s cancellation suppressed their freedoms of expression and peaceful assembly. In written argument the University claimed, for the first time, that the cancellation was due, in part, to its safe spaces obligations under OHSA.

OHSA’s safe spaces provisions are a serious threat to Charter freedoms,” said constitutional lawyer Glenn Blackett.  “Employers who don’t censor ‘unsafe’ speech are liable to be fined or even jailed. This isn’t just the government censoring speech—it is the government requiring private citizens to censor speech too.”

The Court’s decision effectively allows vague legislation to evade constitutional review, undermining the principle that all laws must comply with the Charter.

Lawyers are pressing forward with the key legal and strategic avenues to defend Canadians’ freedoms of expression and conscience from compelled censorship.

Share this:

Grimsby, Ontario (Courtesy of Wikipedia)

Grimsby councillor files second human rights complaint against critics

GRIMSBY, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers have filed responses on behalf of two Grimsby...
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)

Ontario man challenges government censorship of Covid billboard as case awaits hearing date

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a challenge brought by Ontario resident George Katerberg...
Vancouver, British Columbia (Courtesy of heyengel)

Western Standard: Reconciliation or Apartheid 2.0? How Canada’s race-based land pact threatens equality before the law

Rights Recognition Agreement signed in secret between the Musqueam Indian Band and Canada’s federal government recognizes Musqueam...

Explore Related News

Grimsby, Ontario (Courtesy of Wikipedia)
Read More
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)
Read More
Evan Blackman (Courtesy of Evan Blackman)
Read More
Grimsby, Ontario (Courtesy of Wikipedia)
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)
Evan Blackman (Courtesy of Evan Blackman)
School teacher (Courtesy of Crystal Madsen)