Canada’s new anti-spam law lacks clarity

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

Canada’s new anti-spam law lacks clarity

Share this:

More than 150 years ago, one of the characters in Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens claimed that “the law is an ass.” This claim comes to mind whenever laws are unclear, because unclear laws waste our time, and create fear and anxiety.

Canada’s new anti-spam legislation, which comes into force on July 1, 2014, prohibits sending “commercial electronic messages” without the consent of recipients.

A “commercial electronic message” is one that “has as its purpose, or one of its purposes, to encourage participation in a commercial activity….”

A “commercial activity” includes anything that is of a “commercial character, whether or not the person who carries it out does so in the expectation of profit . . . .”

Unfortunately, this new law does not define “commercial.”

The on-line Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “commercial” as: (1) related to or used in the buying and selling of goods and services; (2) concerned with earning money; and (3) relating to or based on the amount of profit that something earns.

To determine whether our monthly email newsletter, the Justice Update, is a “commercial electronic message”, the JCCF has contacted Industry Canada, the Office of the Minister of Industry, and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). To no avail. It seems that the government is not entirely sure of how its own legislation applies to email newsletters sent out by registered charities.

We at the JCCF believe that this monthly email newsletter is not “commercial” in any sense. The Justice Update contains information about the activities and achievements of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), including our court actions and publications. But the CRTC may view it differently, and penalties for violating this new law extend up to one million dollars for individuals and ten million dollars for corporations.

Share this:

Matt and Nicole Alexander (Courtesy of the Alexander family)

Two Ontario teachers challenge union after termination over refusal to celebrate and affirm LGBTQ issues

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers will appear before the Ontario Labour Relations Board...
Sacred text (Courtesy of alexkich)

Western Standard: Criminalizing belief? Liberal-Bloc deal turns holy scriptures into criminal hate speech

Reader beware: the scriptures in the paragraph below might become criminal hate speech if Parliament passes Bill C-9, the Combatting Hate...
Geoffrey Horsman (Courtesy of Geoffrey Horsman)

The Epoch Times: The Doctrine of State Neutrality Should Apply to Land Acknowledgements

Across Canada, indigenous land acknowledgements are now routinely imposed on audiences at all kinds of public meetings. With few exceptions,...

Explore Related News

Matt and Nicole Alexander (Courtesy of the Alexander family)
Read More
Disciplinary committee meeting (Courtesy of C Monk)
Read More
Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)
Read More
Matt and Nicole Alexander (Courtesy of the Alexander family)
Disciplinary committee meeting (Courtesy of C Monk)
Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)
Public meeting (Courtesy of Tzido)