Canada’s new anti-spam law lacks clarity

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

Canada’s new anti-spam law lacks clarity

Share this:

More than 150 years ago, one of the characters in Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens claimed that “the law is an ass.” This claim comes to mind whenever laws are unclear, because unclear laws waste our time, and create fear and anxiety.

Canada’s new anti-spam legislation, which comes into force on July 1, 2014, prohibits sending “commercial electronic messages” without the consent of recipients.

A “commercial electronic message” is one that “has as its purpose, or one of its purposes, to encourage participation in a commercial activity….”

A “commercial activity” includes anything that is of a “commercial character, whether or not the person who carries it out does so in the expectation of profit . . . .”

Unfortunately, this new law does not define “commercial.”

The on-line Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “commercial” as: (1) related to or used in the buying and selling of goods and services; (2) concerned with earning money; and (3) relating to or based on the amount of profit that something earns.

To determine whether our monthly email newsletter, the Justice Update, is a “commercial electronic message”, the JCCF has contacted Industry Canada, the Office of the Minister of Industry, and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). To no avail. It seems that the government is not entirely sure of how its own legislation applies to email newsletters sent out by registered charities.

We at the JCCF believe that this monthly email newsletter is not “commercial” in any sense. The Justice Update contains information about the activities and achievements of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), including our court actions and publications. But the CRTC may view it differently, and penalties for violating this new law extend up to one million dollars for individuals and ten million dollars for corporations.

Share this:

Matt and Nicole Alexander (Courtesy of the Alexander family)

Ontario teachers’ conscience rights case returns to Labour Relations Board

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will return to...
Quebec City Convention Centre (Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)

Quebec government faces trial over cancelled Christian musical event

QUEBEC CITY, QC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the trial in Harvest Ministries International v. Quebec...
Couple discussing finances (Courtesy of SPD)

Epoch Times: The Proposed ‘Protecting Victims Act’ Goes Too Far

Benjamin Franklin wrote 250 years ago that “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and...

Explore Related News

Matt and Nicole Alexander (Courtesy of the Alexander family)
Read More
Quebec City Convention Centre (Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)
Read More
Cory Morgan (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Read More
Matt and Nicole Alexander (Courtesy of the Alexander family)
Quebec City Convention Centre (Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)
Cory Morgan (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Brian Jenkins wearing a sandwich board reading “Let us pray for the end of abortion" (Courtesy of Brian Jenkins)