Canada’s new anti-spam law lacks clarity

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

Canada’s new anti-spam law lacks clarity

Share this:

More than 150 years ago, one of the characters in Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens claimed that “the law is an ass.” This claim comes to mind whenever laws are unclear, because unclear laws waste our time, and create fear and anxiety.

Canada’s new anti-spam legislation, which comes into force on July 1, 2014, prohibits sending “commercial electronic messages” without the consent of recipients.

A “commercial electronic message” is one that “has as its purpose, or one of its purposes, to encourage participation in a commercial activity….”

A “commercial activity” includes anything that is of a “commercial character, whether or not the person who carries it out does so in the expectation of profit . . . .”

Unfortunately, this new law does not define “commercial.”

The on-line Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “commercial” as: (1) related to or used in the buying and selling of goods and services; (2) concerned with earning money; and (3) relating to or based on the amount of profit that something earns.

To determine whether our monthly email newsletter, the Justice Update, is a “commercial electronic message”, the JCCF has contacted Industry Canada, the Office of the Minister of Industry, and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). To no avail. It seems that the government is not entirely sure of how its own legislation applies to email newsletters sent out by registered charities.

We at the JCCF believe that this monthly email newsletter is not “commercial” in any sense. The Justice Update contains information about the activities and achievements of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), including our court actions and publications. But the CRTC may view it differently, and penalties for violating this new law extend up to one million dollars for individuals and ten million dollars for corporations.

Share this:

Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)

Alberta lawyer asks Court of Appeal to consider excluded arguments in challenge to Law Society rules

CALGARY, AB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that Alberta lawyer Roger Song has asked the Court of Appeal of...
External view of Kamloops Indian Residential School (Courtesy of Wikipedia)

Western Standard: The real threat isn’t residential school ‘denialism’ — it’s censorship

On June 1, the Senate Human Rights Committee passed an amendment to Bill C-9, the Combatting Hate Act, that would make...
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)

Can private conversations lead to human rights penalties? BC court to decide

ABBOTSFORD, BC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will appear before...

Explore Related News

Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)
Read More
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)
Read More
Journalist Cory Morgan adjacent to a public highway (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Read More
Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)
Journalist Cory Morgan adjacent to a public highway (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Aqnus)