Canada’s new anti-spam law lacks clarity

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

Canada’s new anti-spam law lacks clarity

Share this:

More than 150 years ago, one of the characters in Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens claimed that “the law is an ass.” This claim comes to mind whenever laws are unclear, because unclear laws waste our time, and create fear and anxiety.

Canada’s new anti-spam legislation, which comes into force on July 1, 2014, prohibits sending “commercial electronic messages” without the consent of recipients.

A “commercial electronic message” is one that “has as its purpose, or one of its purposes, to encourage participation in a commercial activity….”

A “commercial activity” includes anything that is of a “commercial character, whether or not the person who carries it out does so in the expectation of profit . . . .”

Unfortunately, this new law does not define “commercial.”

The on-line Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “commercial” as: (1) related to or used in the buying and selling of goods and services; (2) concerned with earning money; and (3) relating to or based on the amount of profit that something earns.

To determine whether our monthly email newsletter, the Justice Update, is a “commercial electronic message”, the JCCF has contacted Industry Canada, the Office of the Minister of Industry, and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). To no avail. It seems that the government is not entirely sure of how its own legislation applies to email newsletters sent out by registered charities.

We at the JCCF believe that this monthly email newsletter is not “commercial” in any sense. The Justice Update contains information about the activities and achievements of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), including our court actions and publications. But the CRTC may view it differently, and penalties for violating this new law extend up to one million dollars for individuals and ten million dollars for corporations.

Share this:

EXCLUSIVE: Jeffrey Evely disposing of ticket after constitutional win (Courtesy of Jeffrey Evely)

Crown withdraws $28,872.50 ticket issued under unconstitutional Nova Scotia “woods ban”

HALIFAX, NS: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Crown has withdrawn the ticket issued to Jeffrey...
Frances Widdowson (Courtesy of Wyatt Claypool)

University of Victoria trespass case against Dr. Frances Widdowson stayed

VICTORIA, BC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the trespass prosecution against Canadian academic Dr. Frances Widdowson...
Evan Blackman and his son at a hockey game (Courtesy Evan Blackman)

Father whose bank accounts were frozen under Emergencies Act appeals Freedom Convoy conviction

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will appear before...

Explore Related News

EXCLUSIVE: Jeffrey Evely disposing of ticket after constitutional win (Courtesy of Jeffrey Evely)
Read More
Frances Widdowson (Courtesy of Wyatt Claypool)
Read More
Evan Blackman and his son at a hockey game (Courtesy Evan Blackman)
Read More
EXCLUSIVE: Jeffrey Evely disposing of ticket after constitutional win (Courtesy of Jeffrey Evely)
Frances Widdowson (Courtesy of Wyatt Claypool)
Evan Blackman and his son at a hockey game (Courtesy Evan Blackman)
Canadian Identity and Culture Minister Marc Miller during a June 10 press conference on Bill C-34 (Photo credit: THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld)