Canada’s new anti-spam law lacks clarity

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

Canada’s new anti-spam law lacks clarity

Share this:

More than 150 years ago, one of the characters in Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens claimed that “the law is an ass.” This claim comes to mind whenever laws are unclear, because unclear laws waste our time, and create fear and anxiety.

Canada’s new anti-spam legislation, which comes into force on July 1, 2014, prohibits sending “commercial electronic messages” without the consent of recipients.

A “commercial electronic message” is one that “has as its purpose, or one of its purposes, to encourage participation in a commercial activity….”

A “commercial activity” includes anything that is of a “commercial character, whether or not the person who carries it out does so in the expectation of profit . . . .”

Unfortunately, this new law does not define “commercial.”

The on-line Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “commercial” as: (1) related to or used in the buying and selling of goods and services; (2) concerned with earning money; and (3) relating to or based on the amount of profit that something earns.

To determine whether our monthly email newsletter, the Justice Update, is a “commercial electronic message”, the JCCF has contacted Industry Canada, the Office of the Minister of Industry, and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). To no avail. It seems that the government is not entirely sure of how its own legislation applies to email newsletters sent out by registered charities.

We at the JCCF believe that this monthly email newsletter is not “commercial” in any sense. The Justice Update contains information about the activities and achievements of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), including our court actions and publications. But the CRTC may view it differently, and penalties for violating this new law extend up to one million dollars for individuals and ten million dollars for corporations.

Share this:

Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)

Court to consider whether personal religious beliefs qualify for protection from vaccine mandates

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that new legal arguments and evidence have been filed on...
Doug Riffel (centre) with children Willow, Tommy, and Hunter (Courtesy of Doug Riffel)

Northwestern Ontario former indigenous chief challenges banishment as unconstitutional

KENORA, ONTARIO: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers are preparing to file a lawsuit challenging the...
Dr. Widdowson speaks with protesters at the University of Lethbridge prior to the escalation of tensions surrounding her cancelled event (Courtesy of Global News)

Court to review University of Lethbridge cancellation of Widdowson lecture

CALGARY, AB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers for Dr. Frances Widdowson and former student Jonah Pickle will...

Explore Related News

Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)
Read More
Doug Riffel (centre) with children Willow, Tommy, and Hunter (Courtesy of Doug Riffel)
Read More
Dr. Widdowson speaks with protesters at the University of Lethbridge prior to the escalation of tensions surrounding her cancelled event (Courtesy of Global News)
Read More
Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)
Doug Riffel (centre) with children Willow, Tommy, and Hunter (Courtesy of Doug Riffel)
Dr. Widdowson speaks with protesters at the University of Lethbridge prior to the escalation of tensions surrounding her cancelled event (Courtesy of Global News)
Karen Richert (Courtesy of Karen Richert)