Peaceful Freedom Convoy protestor Scott Hockaday, arrested and detained without access to legal counsel, asserts his right to protest at trial

Police enforce an injunction against protesters near Parliament Hill. (Photo credit: Evan Mitsui/CBC)

Peaceful Freedom Convoy protestor Scott Hockaday, arrested and detained without access to legal counsel, asserts his right to protest at trial

Police enforce an injunction against protesters near Parliament Hill. (Photo credit: Evan Mitsui/CBC)

In February 2022, Scott Hockaday protested in Ottawa at the time of the Freedom Convoy in order to motivate government medical officials to debate the doctors who had criticized the government’s Covid response. 

On February 14, 2022, the federal cabinet invoked the Emergencies Act in order to shut down the protest in Ottawa. Government officials claimed at the time that the emergency was nationwide, but it was later proven during a public inquiry that only the protest in Ottawa remained when the Act was invoked. In a later court case, a judge would rule that the invocation of the Emergencies Act was in fact illegal. 

Scott Hockaday is arrested and denied legal representation 

On February 18, 2022, police arrested Mr. Hockaday during the crackdown in Ottawa on the Freedom Convoy.  The arresting officers did not witness Mr. Hockaday do anything other than approach other officers, speak to them, turn around, and put his hands behind his back. The arresting officers then approached the scene and completed the arrest. 

Mr. Hockaday was held in custody for three hours. During that time, RCMP passed him to the Ottawa Police Service. He was then taken in an Ontario Provincial Police transport vehicle to an Ottawa Police Service processing facility. Throughout his detention, he consistently voiced his desire to speak to a lawyer. 

However, during his detention, an officer questioned Mr. Hockaday about a trailer that he had been using and obtained details about that trailer, including the license plate number. The Crown sought to use these statements and photos of the trailer as evidence against Mr. Hockaday at trial.  

The police offered to release Scott Hockaday if he agreed not to call a lawyer 

Near the end of his detention, the Ottawa Police Service offered to release Mr. Hockaday without his having to sign an undertaking on the condition that he did not call a lawyer. (The undertaking required Mr. Hockaday to abide by certain release conditions whether or not he signed it.)  Because he did not have the benefit of legal counsel, Mr. Hockaday did not understand that he would be charged with mischief regardless of whether he signed that undertaking. 

Mr. Hockaday was convicted of mischief on March 14, 2024, by Justice Julie Bourgeois after a trial in the Ontario Court of Justice in Ottawa, Ontario. Justice Bourgois agreed that Mr. Hockaday’s right to counsel was infringed and excluded the evidence obtained by the officer’s questioning. Justice Bourgeois disagreed that Mr. Hockaday was unlawfully arrested and declined to exclude the evidence obtained following his arrest. 

The conviction was appealed, with the appeal hearing scheduled to start on December 18, 2024 in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, in Ottawa. This ended up being postponed until February 2025. 

After conviction, Scott Hockaday asserts his Charter rights on appeal 

In court on Wednesday, February 26, 2025, Mr. Hockaday’s lawyer argued that his Charter right to be free from arbitrary detention and from unreasonable search and seizure were infringed because the arresting officer did not have reasonable grounds to arrest him. 

Lawyer Hatim Kheir stated, “Mr. Hockaday was present in Ottawa in 2022 to protest. The arresting officer did not see Mr. Hockaday do anything other than turn around and present his arms to be handcuffed. He did not know why Mr. Hockaday did this or whether Mr. Hockaday was instructed to do so by other officers. We are arguing that this does not meet the constitutional requirements for a legal arrest. Mr. Hockaday is hopeful that the Superior Court will remedy the infringements of his Charter rights by excluding illegally obtained evidence and by acquitting him of mischief.” 

Appeal filed 

On April 25, 2025, an application for Leave to Appeal was been filed and pending with the Ontario Court of Appeal.

Justices render final decision

On Wednesday, November 19, 2025, the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by peaceful Freedom Convoy protester Scott Hockaday, who was convicted of mischief following his arrest during the 2022 Ottawa crackdown. His counsel argued that his Charter rights to counsel, and freedom from arbitrary detention and unreasonable search and seizure, were violated.

This final decision was rendered by Justices Sossin, Copeland, and Gomery.

Share this:

December 9, 2020: Notice of Application
December 14, 2020: Affidavit of Dale Wohlgemuth
December 30, 2020: Affidavit of Christopher Lowe
January 4, 2021: Affidavit of Ross Mackay
January 5, 2021: Affidavit of Jay Bhattacharya
January 5, 2021: Affidavit of Riley Toews
January 5, 2021: Affidavit of Tobias Tissen
January 6, 2021: Affidavit of Roger Thomas
January 7, 2021: Affidavit of Thomas Rempel
January 8, 2021: Amended Notice of Application
March 2, 2021: Affidavit of Jason Kindrachuk
March 4, 2021: Affidavit of Carla Loeppky
March 5, 2021: Affidavit of Jared Manley Peter Bullard
March 5, 2021: Affidavit of Lanette Siragusa
March 5, 2021: Affidavit of Szilveszter Jozsef Komlodi
March 8, 2021: Affidavit of Brent Roussin
March 24, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Riley Toews
March 25, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Christopher Lowe
March 26, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Thomas Rempel
March 26, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Tobias Tissen
March 30, 2021: Repy Affidavit of Thomas Warren
March 31, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Jay Bhattacharya
April 1, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Ross Mackay
April 1, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Joel Kettner
April 12, 2021: Application Brief of the Applicants
April 12, 2021: Application Brief of the Respondents
April 20, 2021: Affidavit of David Hersey
April 20, 2021: Reply Affidavit of James Blanchard
April 29, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Jared Manley Peter Bullard
April 29, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Jason Kindrachuk
April 30, 2021: Amended Amended Notice of Application
April 30, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Brent Roussin
April 30, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Carla Loeppky
April 30, 2021: Reply Affidavit of Lanette Siragusa
October 21, 2021: Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba, Decision by Chief Justice Glenn D. Joyal
Octobe 21, 2021: Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba, Decision by Chief Justice Glenn D. Joyal on Constitutional Issues
February 1, 2022: Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba – Ruling on Costs
February 11, 2022: Judgment on Constitutional Questions re: Public Health Act
May 20, 2022: Appellant’s Appeal Book Volume 1
May 20, 2022: Appellant’s Appeal Book Volume 2
May 20, 2022: Appellant’s Appeal Book Volume 3
May 20, 2022: Appellant’s Appeal Book Volume 4
May 20, 2022: Appellant’s Appeal Book Volume 5
May 20, 2022: Appellant’s Appeal Book Volume 6
May 20, 2022: Appellant’s Appeal Book Volume 7
May 20, 2022: Appellant’s Appeal Book Volume 8
May 20, 2022: Appellant’s Appeal Book Volume 9
May 20, 2022: Appellant’s Appeal Book Volume 10
May 20, 2022: Appellant’s Appeal Book Volume 11
May 24, 2022: Appellant’s Factum
June 3, 2022: Factum of the Intervener The Association for Reformed Political Action (ARPA) Canada
June 27, 2022: Factum of the Respondents
June 19, 2023: Court of Appeal Decision
September 11, 2023: Certificate of Decision
September 15, 2023: Supreme Court of Canada Certificate of Appeal
September 15, 2023: Notice of Name
September 15, 2023: Certificate of Council Respondents
September 15, 2023: Application for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada
October 18, 2023: Response for Application for Leave to Appeal
October 30, 2023: Reply to the Response for Application for Leave to Appeal
March 14, 2024: Supreme Court of Canada Dismissal of Leave to Appeal

Associated News Releases

Related News