Justice Centre defends freedom of expression in Oger v. Whatcott BC Human Rights hearing

Share this:

Justice Centre defends freedom of expression in Oger v. Whatcott BC Human Rights hearing

Share this:

During the 2017 British Columbia provincial election campaign, activist Bill Whatcott handed out over 1,000 flyers in the electoral district of Vancouver False Creek.  The flyer expressed Whatcott’s opinions and “concern about the promotion and growth of homosexuality and transvestitism in British Columbia.”  In his flyers, Whatcott asserted that NDP candidate Morgane Oger was a male, and argued that “[t]hose who promote falsehoods like the NDP and BC’s major media . . . do so to their eternal peril.”

Oger narrowly lost the campaign to a former Vancouver mayor.

Oger filed a human rights complaint against Whatcott, alleging that Whatcott’s flyers had exposed Oger to discrimination, hatred and contempt under section 7 of the BC Human Rights Code.  

In December of 2017, the Tribunal granted the Justice Centre permission to intervene in this case, to make submissions in defence of freedom of expression under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  The Tribunal noted that the Justice Centre “may provide useful input … with regard to the law”.

The Justice Centre will be providing oral and written submissions concerning the interpretation and application of the freedom of expression, guaranteed under section 2(b) of the Charter, in the Tribunal’s adjudication of the complaint.  In particular, the Justice Centre’s submissions will focus on the critical importance of freedom of expression to the democratic discourse, especially during elections.  In this context, censoring expression of honest beliefs and views made during an election campaign is highly inappropriate.   The purpose of election campaigns is to sift false allegations from true allegations, poor character from good character, and bad policies from good policies. To achieve this, citizens must not be prevented from expressing their beliefs and to criticize candidates openly and publicly.

“Political expression is the lifeblood of democracy, and cannot be limited, especially not during elections,” explains lawyer and Justice Centre president John Carpay. “Whether particular claims and assertions are correct or not should be decided by citizens themselves, not by government deciding on everyone’s behalf,” continued Carpay.

Share this:

Evan Blackman (Photo courtesy of Evan Blackman)

Court compels RCMP and TD Bank to hand over records related to freezing of peaceful protestor’s bank accounts

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a judge of the Ontario Court of Justice has...

Western Standard: Team Ideology has scored the opening point against Team Reality, but the game is far from finished

Last Friday, Justin Trudeau-appointed Justice Allison Kuntz granted the advocacy group Egale Canada a temporary injunction against Alberta’s Bill 26. Bill...
Nanaimo City Hall (Photo Credit: CBC)

City of Nanaimo faces legal threat after banning recording in public spaces

NANAIMO, BC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers provided by the Justice Centre have sent a...

Explore Related News

Evan Blackman (Photo courtesy of Evan Blackman)
Read More
Nanaimo City Hall (Photo Credit: CBC)
Read More
Photo Credit: Evan Blackman at a hockey game with his son Damian
Read More
Evan Blackman (Photo courtesy of Evan Blackman)
Nanaimo City Hall (Photo Credit: CBC)
Photo Credit: Evan Blackman at a hockey game with his son Damian
Photo Credit: Wideonet