Justice Centre granted intervener status to defend conscience rights for medical practitioners

Share this:

Justice Centre granted intervener status to defend conscience rights for medical practitioners

Share this:

The Justice Centre has been granted leave to intervene at the Court of Appeal of Ontario, January 21 and 22, to defend the Charter rights of medical practitioners.

The Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada (“CMDS”) and others are challenging the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (the “CPSO”) over CPSO policies that require medical practitioners to (1) provide “an effective referral” for medical procedures and services, even if those services conflict with a doctor’s conscientious or religious beliefs, and even to perform such services when “necessary to prevent imminent harm”; and (2) provide “an effective referral” for physician-assisted suicide, also known as Medical Assistance in Dying (“MAID”).

The Superior Court of Justice of Ontario heard this case on June 13-15, 2017. The Justice Centre’s argument in the lower court focused on the Supreme Court of Canada’s repeated rulings that there is no Charter right to health care; there is therefore no Charter right to any medical procedure, including MAID.  Further, there is no right, Charter or otherwise, to demand that an individual doctor perform or provide an “effective referral” for a specific medical procedure or service that violates that doctor’s conscientious or religious beliefs.  On the contrary, doctors have protected conscience and religious rights under section 2(a) of the Charter, and government bodies like the College are required to respect those Charter freedoms.

The lower court ruled in favour of the College on January 31, 2018.

The Justice Centre’s appeal factum focuses on three key errors made by the lower court in its ruling: that it 1) too broadly defined the effective referral requirements and therefore immunized the effective referral requirement from challenge under the Oakes test; (2) failed to properly define “equitable access to healthcare” thereby making the Oakes test unworkable; and (3) found that Canadians have a Charter right to equitable healthcare.

The Oakes test, created by the Supreme Court of Canada in the 1986 case of R v Oakes, interprets section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the “reasonable limits clause,” to mean that the government must establish that the benefits of a law outweigh its violation of a Charter right.

Share this:

Saskatchewan Court of Appeal upholds outdoor gathering restrictions

SASKATOON, SK: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is disappointed to announce that the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has dismissed the appeal...

All charges against Maxime Bernier for Niagara protest dismissed

ST. CATHARINES, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is pleased to announce that two charges against federal party leader Maxime Bernier have...

Healthcare workers obtain partial win against Bonnie Henry in BC Supreme Court

VANCOUVER, BC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is pleased to announce that the British Columbia Supreme Court has remitted back to...

Explore Related News

Lockdown Protesters
Read More
MB
Read More
029680d0-325c-5fdf-9857-8a0e2651c7a8
Read More
Lockdown Protesters
MB
029680d0-325c-5fdf-9857-8a0e2651c7a8
e88bded4-01bd-eb42-6421-7e2e336408ac
Explore Further