MEDIA ADVISORY: Justice Centre appears before Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage to testify re: Charter impact of M-103

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

MEDIA ADVISORY: Justice Centre appears before Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage to testify re: Charter impact of M-103

Share this:

OTTAWA: The Justice Centre will appear before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Wednesday, September 27, to explain the potential impact of Bill M-103 (“Systemic racism and religious discrimination”) on Charter rights.

The Justice Centre’s Litigation Director, Jay Cameron, will appear before the Standing Committee between 3:30 P.M. and 5:30 P.M. in the Wellington Building, room 415.  Other witnesses include Fr. Raymond J. de Souza, Canadian Council of Imams, Council for Muslims Facing Tomorrow, and International Christian Voice.

On March 23rd 2017, the Canadian House of Commons passed M-103, a non-binding Motion that condemns religious discrimination, while particularly highlighting “Islamophobia”. The term “Islamophobia” is not defined in the Motion.

As outlined in its Brief to Parliament, the Justice Centre writes:

Attempting to “completely eliminate racism and religious discrimination including “Islamophobia” in Canada’s multicultural society would require government oppression and control of not only speech and expression, but thought itself. In proposing to eliminate racism, discrimination and “Islamophobia”, the government necessarily makes itself the sole arbiter of what constitutes those things, and tasks itself with their elimination. If M-103 is legislatively codified, the unconstitutional infringement of freedom of thought, belief, expression and religion is inevitable.

The Justice Centre will make three key observations to the Committee:

  1. The Motion is vague and lacks the certainty for proper legislative recommendations.
  2. The state has no business in attempting to control the minds and thoughts of its citizens, as is implicitly proposed by the Motion – the Charter stands as a guardian between the citizen and oppressive state action.
  3. The term “Islamophobia,” interpreted to mean an “irrational fear of Islam,” is not capable of legislative prevention.

Share this:

Do not enter (Courtesy of Adobe Stock)

Western Standard: From fire prevention to freedom violation — inside the court decision that rebuked Nova Scotia government

In August 2025, the Nova Scotia government prohibited all activities across three-quarters of the province on the pretext of preventing...
Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)

Quebec woman faces disciplinary complaint for helping couples with Christian counselling

MONTREAL, QC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre are assisting Maryse...
Jeff Evely, who received a $28,000 ticket for walking in the woods during the summer of 2025 (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)

Epoch Times: Court Ruling on Nova Scotia’s ‘Woods Ban’ a Victory for Freedom

Our ancient right to move about freely was affirmed and vindicated by the Nova Scotia Supreme Court on April 17,...

Explore Related News

Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)
Read More
Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa (Courtesy of Iryna)
Read More
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Deyan)
Read More
Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)
Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa (Courtesy of Iryna)
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Deyan)
Jeff Evely (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)