MEDIA ADVISORY: Justice Centre appears before Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage to testify re: Charter impact of M-103

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

MEDIA ADVISORY: Justice Centre appears before Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage to testify re: Charter impact of M-103

Share this:

OTTAWA: The Justice Centre will appear before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage Wednesday, September 27, to explain the potential impact of Bill M-103 (“Systemic racism and religious discrimination”) on Charter rights.

The Justice Centre’s Litigation Director, Jay Cameron, will appear before the Standing Committee between 3:30 P.M. and 5:30 P.M. in the Wellington Building, room 415.  Other witnesses include Fr. Raymond J. de Souza, Canadian Council of Imams, Council for Muslims Facing Tomorrow, and International Christian Voice.

On March 23rd 2017, the Canadian House of Commons passed M-103, a non-binding Motion that condemns religious discrimination, while particularly highlighting “Islamophobia”. The term “Islamophobia” is not defined in the Motion.

As outlined in its Brief to Parliament, the Justice Centre writes:

Attempting to “completely eliminate racism and religious discrimination including “Islamophobia” in Canada’s multicultural society would require government oppression and control of not only speech and expression, but thought itself. In proposing to eliminate racism, discrimination and “Islamophobia”, the government necessarily makes itself the sole arbiter of what constitutes those things, and tasks itself with their elimination. If M-103 is legislatively codified, the unconstitutional infringement of freedom of thought, belief, expression and religion is inevitable.

The Justice Centre will make three key observations to the Committee:

  1. The Motion is vague and lacks the certainty for proper legislative recommendations.
  2. The state has no business in attempting to control the minds and thoughts of its citizens, as is implicitly proposed by the Motion – the Charter stands as a guardian between the citizen and oppressive state action.
  3. The term “Islamophobia,” interpreted to mean an “irrational fear of Islam,” is not capable of legislative prevention.

Share this:

Nova Scotia Supreme Court (Courtesy of Rosemarie Mosteller)

Rule of Law Rejected as Canada Increasingly Embraces Racism

“Judge reduces sex criminal’s jail time because of his race,” reads the headline of one...
Chris Barber and his truck, “Big Red” (Courtesy of Chris Barber)

Judge dismisses Crown’s attempt to forfeit Chris Barber’s truck

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Ontario Court of Justice has dismissed the Crown’s...
BC Court of Appeal (Courtesy of CBC)

B.C. Court of Appeal rules court orders must be clear and cannot shield lower court decisions from appeal

VANCOUVER, BC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the British Columbia Court of Appeal has ruled that...

Explore Related News

Chris Barber and his truck, “Big Red” (Courtesy of Chris Barber)
Read More
BC Court of Appeal (Courtesy of CBC)
Read More
Chris Barber’s truck, “Big Red” (Courtesy of Chris Barber)
Read More
Chris Barber and his truck, “Big Red” (Courtesy of Chris Barber)
BC Court of Appeal (Courtesy of CBC)
Chris Barber’s truck, “Big Red” (Courtesy of Chris Barber)
BC Court of Appeal (Courtesy of CBC)