The Justice Centre sues the Montreal public transit authority for censorship

Share this:

The Justice Centre sues the Montreal public transit authority for censorship

Share this:

Montréal, QC: The Justice Centre today announced the filing of an application for judicial review against Montreal’s transit authority, the Société de transport de Montréal (STM), which refused to post an advertisement criticizing a transit fee rate hike. The transit authority rejected the ad on the alleged basis that it “denigrates public transit”.

The Association pour le transport collectif de la Rive-Sud (the “Association”) is a non-profit organization of transit users whose goal is to propose solutions to improve the public transit system on the South Shore of Montreal. In early June, the Association proposed the following ad, which reports the price for transit tickets from Montréal ($3.50) and from the South Shore ($5.25), with the following comment (English translation): “Logical? Not to us. Let us denounce the rate hike imposed by ARTM”. The Autorité régionale de transport métropolitain (ARTM) is the regional transit authority vested with planning powers over a vast area, notably the South Shore of Montréal.

On or about June 13, 2022, the Montreal public transit authority rejected the ad on the alleged ground that it (English translation) “denigrates public transit”.

This case bears a striking resemblance to Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority v. Canadian Federation of Students — British Columbia Component, 2009 SCC 31, a 2009 Supreme Court of Canada judgment in which it was held that the Vancouver public transit authority was bound by the Charter when making decisions respecting public display (e.g. ads on buses), and whose policy banning political advertisements was declared unconstitutional.

“It would seem that the Montreal public transit authority chose complacency for its partner organization, instead of acting in a fair and balanced manner,” says Samuel Bachand, attorney for the Association, and primary external counsel with the Justice Centre in the Province of Québec.

“This is a blatant violation of our freedom of expression. STM is hiding behind policies and contractual agreements in an attempt to avoid judicial scrutiny. Such superficial arguments will not hold water in a court of law,” adds Axel Fournier, spokesman for the Association.

Share this:

Medical hormone pills (Courtesy of Adobe Stock)

Epoch Times: Whether Courts Defer to Government Depends on the Political Issue at Play

On June 27, the Alberta Court of King’s Bench suspended Alberta’s law to protect vulnerable minors from puberty blockers and...
Evan Blackman (Photo courtesy of Evan Blackman)

Court compels RCMP and TD Bank to hand over records related to freezing of peaceful protestor’s bank accounts

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a judge of the Ontario Court of Justice has...

Western Standard: Team Ideology has scored the opening point against Team Reality, but the game is far from finished

Last Friday, Justin Trudeau-appointed Justice Allison Kuntz granted the advocacy group Egale Canada a temporary injunction against Alberta’s Bill 26. Bill...

Explore Related News

Evan Blackman (Photo courtesy of Evan Blackman)
Read More
Nanaimo City Hall (Photo Credit: CBC)
Read More
Photo Credit: Evan Blackman at a hockey game with his son Damian
Read More
Evan Blackman (Photo courtesy of Evan Blackman)
Nanaimo City Hall (Photo Credit: CBC)
Photo Credit: Evan Blackman at a hockey game with his son Damian
Photo Credit: Wideonet