Trudeau and Premiers questioned about consequences to human health and lives from government-imposed lockdowns

Share this:

Trudeau and Premiers questioned about consequences to human health and lives from government-imposed lockdowns

Share this:

 

CALGARY: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (jccf.ca) today released letters to Prime Minister Trudeau, and to each of the ten Premiers (Ball, Ford, Higgs, Horgan, Kenney, King, Legault, McNeil, Moe, Pallister), publicly asking questions about the cost – in human life and human health – of government measures which violate the fundamental Charter freedoms of Canadians to move, travel, associate, assemble, and practice one’s faith.

“The Justice Centre fully supports governments taking appropriate measures to combat the spread of COVID-19,” stated lawyer John Carpay, president of the Justice Centre.

“The Justice Centre also insists that governments meet their obligation under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to violate our rights as little as possible, and only to the extent that is truly necessary to achieve legitimate government objectives,” continued Carpay.

Today, April 17, 2020, marks the 38th anniversary of the Charter coming into force in 1982. The Charter safeguards liberty as its first priority. The Charter is intended to prevent governments from infringing the fundamental freedoms of Canadians, and permits infringement only in exceptional circumstances and only to the extent that a government can show its actions are “demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” (Charter section 1)

Once citizens are able to show that their rights have been violated, the onus then shifts to the government to justify its violation of those rights. This burden is on the government, not the citizens. This burden is intended by the Charter to be an onerous one.

Canada’s federal and provincial governments claim saving lives as the justification for government measures that severely violate Charter rights and freedoms. This is a worthy goal that potentially justifies violating the fundamental freedoms of citizens, at least for a limited and specified period of time. At the same time, while recognizing the legitimacy of a government’s objective, courts will also conduct a balancing exercise, requiring governments to fully weigh and consider both the harms and the benefits of government actions that violate Charter freedoms.

Under the Charter, Canada’s elected leaders are required to give very serious consideration to the number of lives that will be lost as a result of the social isolation and economic devastation that Charter-violating government measures against COVID-19 are inflicting on Canadians.

 

Read more about the Justice Centre’s response to COVID-19, emergency powers and liberty, including columns, videos and podcasts.

Share this:

Censorship (Courtesy of Jorm Sangsorn)

Western Standard: Ottawa’s assault on our internet freedoms must stop now

As we enter 2026, Canada’s federal government is quietly but surely transforming Canada’s centuries-old traditions of free speech and privacy...
Protest sign (Courtesy of Margarita)

Juno News: Race-based laws and policies are always a bad idea

Canada was one of the leaders of the international opposition to the Apartheid laws in South Africa, in force from...
Nova Scotia Supreme Court (Courtesy of Rosemarie Mosteller)

Epoch Times: Rule of Law Rejected as Canada Increasingly Embraces Racism

“Judge reduces sex criminal’s jail time because of his race,” reads the headline of one...

Explore Related News

Chris Barber and his truck, “Big Red” (Courtesy of Chris Barber)
Read More
BC Court of Appeal (Courtesy of CBC)
Read More
Chris Barber’s truck, “Big Red” (Courtesy of Chris Barber)
Read More
Chris Barber and his truck, “Big Red” (Courtesy of Chris Barber)
BC Court of Appeal (Courtesy of CBC)
Chris Barber’s truck, “Big Red” (Courtesy of Chris Barber)
BC Court of Appeal (Courtesy of CBC)