News Release: McLeod v. Mount Royal University court action ends with apology from university president

Share this:

News Release: McLeod v. Mount Royal University court action ends with apology from university president

Share this:

JCCF_FallAd_150px180pCALGARY: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) today announced that the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench action in Nicholas McLeod v. Mount Royal University has been settled on terms that recognize and respect campus free speech.

On February 19, 2013, Mr. McLeod was peacefully distributing pro-life literature at Mount Royal University (MRU) when a security guard ordered him to stop; the guard found the literature “offensive”.  Not long thereafter, Mr. McLeod was confronted by several security guards who threw him to the ground, hand-cuffed him, and confined him to a small room for several hours, with his hands painfully cuffed behind his back.

When confronted by the security guard, Mr. McLeod initially refused to stop distributing his pamphlets, relying on the R. v. Whatcott court ruling.  In R. v. Whatcott, the University of Calgary had charged a man with trespassing because he was peacefully distributing literature on campus.  Campus security guards arrested the man because they disagreed with the content of his flyers.  The Court threw out the trespassing charges and ruled that all people, including non-students, have a legal right to distribute literature peacefully on a university campus.

MRU initially took a hard line against McLeod, refusing to apologize or negotiate any kind of settlement.  This made court action necessary.  The court action settled with Dr. Docherty apologizing to Mr. McLeod for the behaviour of MRU security guards, their unnecessary use of force, the unlawful detention, and the violation of Charter rights.  In his letter of apology, Dr. Docherty stated that “supplemental training will be conducted to ensure that community officers understand the interaction between the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and their duties in maintaining a safe campus environment.”

“Taxpayer-funded universities ought to be safe places for free expression.  Dr. Docherty should be commended for his leadership in this regard,” stated Calgary John Carpay, who represented Nicholas McLeod in his court action against Mount Royal University.

Share this:

Rural Municipality of Springfield, Manitoba (Courtesy of Daniel Page)

Rural Municipality of Springfield defends ban on recording public meetings as case heads to court

WINNIPEG, MB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Rural Municipality of Springfield (Municipality) has filed its...
Censorship (Courtesy of Paweł Michałowski)

New Westminster Times: Free Speech in Peril: Canada’s Censorship Industrial Complex

Over the past three years, Parliament has seen Bills introduced that would strip supposedly “hateful” and “harmful” content (as defined...
Telecommunications (Courtesy of xiaoliangge)

Western Standard: From watchdog to censorship machine — why the CRTC must be abolished

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has become a censorship tool of the federal government...

Explore Related News

Rural Municipality of Springfield, Manitoba (Courtesy of Daniel Page)
Read More
Geoffrey Horsman (Courtesy of Geoffrey Horsman
Read More
Justice Centre report
Read More
Rural Municipality of Springfield, Manitoba (Courtesy of Daniel Page)
Geoffrey Horsman (Courtesy of Geoffrey Horsman
Justice Centre report
Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree announces the introduction of Bill C-22 on March 12, 2026 (Photo credit: The Canadian Press/Spencer Colby)