Steps forward, steps backward, in Bill 24 changes to the Alberta Bill of Rights

Share this:

Alberta Legislature

Steps forward, steps backward, in Bill 24 changes to the Alberta Bill of Rights

Alberta Legislature

Share this:

The Justice Centre applauds various proposed amendments to the Alberta Bill of Rights in Bill 24, introduced in the Legislative Assembly of Alberta on October 28, 2024, especially those which:

  • Recognize the important “position of the family in a society of free people and free institutions”
  • Recognize that freedoms are important “including during times of emergency”
  • Ensure that Courts will actually apply the Alberta Bill of Rights to the laws and actions of the Alberta government
  • Clarify that the Alberta Bill of Rights shall apply to the Legislative Assembly of Alberta and to the Government of Alberta
  • Recognize “the right of the individual with capacity not to be subjected to, or coerced into receiving, a vaccine without the consent of that individual”
  • Increase protections for property rights

The Justice Centre is disappointed, however, that the proposed amendments subject the rights and freedoms of Alberta to “reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic Alberta.” This language, because it mirrors section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, affords the Government of Alberta and government entities in Alberta too much latitude to violate rights and freedoms, given the broad deference Courts have recently given government under that language to violate Charter rights and freedoms. In theory, this language could result in citizens’ rights and freedoms being protected from abuse by government, but in practice judges have interpreted these words to make it easy for governments to violate fundamental Charter freedoms.

The Justice Centre is concerned about proposed amendments that appear to offer weak protections against forced medical care and treatment outside of a context involving vaccines. If Bill 24 passes in its current form, Albertans could be coerced into receiving medical care, treatments, or procedures if it is believed that the “individual is likely to cause substantial harm to that individual or to others” by not receiving it.

Read John Carpay’s recent column on the Alberta Bill of Rights. 

Share this:

Supreme Court of Canada (Courtesy of Google Maps)

New Westminster Times: Notwithstanding: John Carpay on Woke Judges & Section 33 of the Charter

The Supreme Court of Canada has now finished listening to arguments from the federal government about watering down section 33...
Photo of Dr. Widdowson (Courtesy of an anonymous contributor)

Complaint filed after police failed to respond to repeated 911 calls during violent confrontation at University of Winnipeg

WINNIPEG, MB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a complaint has been filed with Manitoba’s Law...
Surveillance (Courtesy of ImageFlow)

Western Standard: Ottawa froze protesters’ bank accounts — now Ottawa wants your phone records

Like many expansions of government power, Bill C-22 (dubbed the Lawful Access Act) arrives dressed in reassuring bureaucratic language....

Explore Related News

Photo of Dr. Widdowson (Courtesy of an anonymous contributor)
Read More
Rural Municipality of Springfield, Manitoba (Courtesy of Daniel Page)
Read More
Geoffrey Horsman (Courtesy of Geoffrey Horsman
Read More
Photo of Dr. Widdowson (Courtesy of an anonymous contributor)
Rural Municipality of Springfield, Manitoba (Courtesy of Daniel Page)
Geoffrey Horsman (Courtesy of Geoffrey Horsman
Justice Centre report