Steps forward, steps backward, in Bill 24 changes to the Alberta Bill of Rights

Share this:

Alberta Legislature

Steps forward, steps backward, in Bill 24 changes to the Alberta Bill of Rights

Alberta Legislature

Share this:

The Justice Centre applauds various proposed amendments to the Alberta Bill of Rights in Bill 24, introduced in the Legislative Assembly of Alberta on October 28, 2024, especially those which:

  • Recognize the important “position of the family in a society of free people and free institutions”
  • Recognize that freedoms are important “including during times of emergency”
  • Ensure that Courts will actually apply the Alberta Bill of Rights to the laws and actions of the Alberta government
  • Clarify that the Alberta Bill of Rights shall apply to the Legislative Assembly of Alberta and to the Government of Alberta
  • Recognize “the right of the individual with capacity not to be subjected to, or coerced into receiving, a vaccine without the consent of that individual”
  • Increase protections for property rights

The Justice Centre is disappointed, however, that the proposed amendments subject the rights and freedoms of Alberta to “reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic Alberta.” This language, because it mirrors section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, affords the Government of Alberta and government entities in Alberta too much latitude to violate rights and freedoms, given the broad deference Courts have recently given government under that language to violate Charter rights and freedoms. In theory, this language could result in citizens’ rights and freedoms being protected from abuse by government, but in practice judges have interpreted these words to make it easy for governments to violate fundamental Charter freedoms.

The Justice Centre is concerned about proposed amendments that appear to offer weak protections against forced medical care and treatment outside of a context involving vaccines. If Bill 24 passes in its current form, Albertans could be coerced into receiving medical care, treatments, or procedures if it is believed that the “individual is likely to cause substantial harm to that individual or to others” by not receiving it.

Read John Carpay’s recent column on the Alberta Bill of Rights. 

Share this:

Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)

Alberta lawyer asks Court of Appeal to consider excluded arguments in challenge to Law Society rules

CALGARY, AB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that Alberta lawyer Roger Song has asked the Court of Appeal of...
External view of Kamloops Indian Residential School (Courtesy of Wikipedia)

Western Standard: The real threat isn’t residential school ‘denialism’ — it’s censorship

On June 1, the Senate Human Rights Committee passed an amendment to Bill C-9, the Combatting Hate Act, that would make...
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)

Can private conversations lead to human rights penalties? BC court to decide

ABBOTSFORD, BC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will appear before...

Explore Related News

Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)
Read More
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)
Read More
Journalist Cory Morgan adjacent to a public highway (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Read More
Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)
Journalist Cory Morgan adjacent to a public highway (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Aqnus)