Nova Scotia Supreme Court dismisses judge’s complaint that her privacy and independence were violated

Share this:

(Photo: Courtesy of Rickcola Brinton)

Nova Scotia Supreme Court dismisses judge’s complaint that her privacy and independence were violated

(Photo: Courtesy of Rickcola Brinton)

Share this:

HALIFAX, NS: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is disappointed that the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia has dismissed the judicial review of Judge Rickcola Brinton, whose medical privacy and judicial independence were violated in 2021.

The decision by Justice Christa Brothers was released two days before Christmas, on December 23, 2024.

Rickcola Brinton was a judge of the Provincial Court of Nova Scotia in 2021 when then-Chief Judge Pamela S. Williams imposed a vaccine mandate on all sitting judges.

Judge Brinton raised concerns with her colleagues about this policy because she believed it could impact marginalized communities and the judiciary’s role as impartial decision-makers. She declined to share her private medical information with Chief Judge Williams regarding her Covid vaccination status.

Chief Judge Williams then threatened to suspend Judge Brinton and to report her to the Judicial Council.

Judge Brinton went on medical leave after the vaccine mandate. Without her knowledge or consent, Judge Williams asked Judge Brinton’s doctor to hand over medical information related to her leave, as well as her Covid vaccination status.

Judge Brinton filed a complaint against Chief Judge Williams for improperly contacting her doctor to obtain that confidential medical information. The Chief Justice of Nova Scotia, Michael J. Wood, reviewed the complaint and summarily dismissed it without sending it to a review committee.

On June 6, 2023, Judge Brinton asked for a judicial review of this decision on grounds that it was unreasonable for the Chief Justice to summarily dismiss the complaint without following the normal procedure of putting it before a three-person committee. (A judicial review is a process by which courts make sure that the decisions of administrative bodies are fair, reasonable, and lawful.)

Lawyers for Judge Brinton also argued that the judge failed to appropriately balance the dismissal of her complaint against her constitutional rights and principles, including the principle of judicial independence and the right to keep her personal medical information private.

Our lawyers are now consulting with Judge Brinton and considering an appeal.

Share this:

Karen Richert (Courtesy of Karen Richert)

Human rights complaint targets Alberta woman for online opinions about “family-friendly” drag show

LEDUC, ALBERTA: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre are representing Karen...
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)

Ontario court to hear constitutional challenge to political billboard ban

SUDBURY, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Ontario Divisional Court will hear a constitutional challenge...
Supreme Court of Canada (Courtesy of Google Maps)

New Westminster Times: Notwithstanding: John Carpay on Woke Judges & Section 33 of the Charter

The Supreme Court of Canada has now finished listening to arguments from the federal government about watering down section 33...

Explore Related News

Karen Richert (Courtesy of Karen Richert)
Read More
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)
Read More
Photo of Dr. Widdowson (Courtesy of an anonymous contributor)
Read More
Karen Richert (Courtesy of Karen Richert)
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)
Photo of Dr. Widdowson (Courtesy of an anonymous contributor)
Rural Municipality of Springfield, Manitoba (Courtesy of Daniel Page)