Alberta Education claims Minister’s unexplained “opinion” is the law

Share this:

Alberta Education claims Minister’s unexplained “opinion” is the law

Share this:

The Justice Centre has released recent correspondence (123) between Alberta Education and independent faith-based schools.

In September of 2018, Deputy Minister Curtis Clark threatened religious schools with defunding and loss of accreditation if they do not remove religious content from their “Safe and Caring” school policies.

During the week of October 1-5, several schools whose Safe and Caring policies had been deemed non-compliant by the Alberta Education “Safe and Caring Team” requested clarification (123) as to how the religious views expressed in their policies could be found to violate “diversity” or be “unwelcoming, uncaring and/or disrespectful”.The October correspondence shows the Alberta government refusing to provide any explanation as to how, for example, “diversity” is threatened by a school’s policy that reflects the school’s belief in the Bible as truth.  The October correspondence shows Alberta Education justifying its ban on faith references in school policies solely on the basis of “the opinion of the Minister.”

Various schools responded to this “rainbow reprimand” by asking simple and direct questions about how or why the religious content of their school policies was contrary to “diversity” or contrary to providing a safe, welcoming, caring and respectful learning environment.  Alberta Education responded with a form response (12) that cited only “the opinion of the Minister” to support Alberta Education’s conclusion that these schools’ religious beliefs, expressed in their own school policies, were unacceptable.

The Justice Centre represents parents and dozens of schools in a constitutional challenge to various provisions of Bill 24, including secrecy provisions that make it illegal for teachers and principals to inform parents about their own children as young as five.

Share this:

Rural Municipality of Springfield, Manitoba (Courtesy of Daniel Page)

Rural Municipality of Springfield defends ban on recording public meetings as case heads to court

WINNIPEG, MB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Rural Municipality of Springfield (Municipality) has filed its...
Censorship (Courtesy of Paweł Michałowski)

New Westminster Times: Free Speech in Peril: Canada’s Censorship Industrial Complex

Over the past three years, Parliament has seen Bills introduced that would strip supposedly “hateful” and “harmful” content (as defined...
Telecommunications (Courtesy of xiaoliangge)

Western Standard: From watchdog to censorship machine — why the CRTC must be abolished

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has become a censorship tool of the federal government...

Explore Related News

Rural Municipality of Springfield, Manitoba (Courtesy of Daniel Page)
Read More
Geoffrey Horsman (Courtesy of Geoffrey Horsman
Read More
Justice Centre report
Read More
Rural Municipality of Springfield, Manitoba (Courtesy of Daniel Page)
Geoffrey Horsman (Courtesy of Geoffrey Horsman
Justice Centre report
Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree announces the introduction of Bill C-22 on March 12, 2026 (Photo credit: The Canadian Press/Spencer Colby)