B.C. Court of Appeal rules for freedom in Trinity Western University v. Law Society of British Columbia

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

B.C. Court of Appeal rules for freedom in Trinity Western University v. Law Society of British Columbia

Share this:

B.C. Court of Appeal rules for freedom in Trinity Western University v. Law Society of British Columbia

The Justice Centre expressed satisfaction with the ruling of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia in Trinity Western University v. Law Society of British Columbia, released November 1, 2016.

“The Court of Appeal’s decision is a victory for freedom of association, freedom of conscience and religion, and freedom of expression,” said Justice Centre president John Carpay. “All Canadians must be free to peacefully associate with one another under common beliefs and values, without punishment, and this court today upheld those freedoms.”

The Law Society of British Columbia refuses to recognize the law program of Trinity Western University (TWU), a private Evangelical Christian university in Langley, B.C.  The Federation of Law Societies of Canada has approved the law program of TWU as meeting academic and professional standards.  The Law Society does not allege that there is anything wrong with TWU’s law program, but claims that TWU’s Community Covenant discriminates against the LGBTQ+ community.  The Community Covenant prohibits numerous legal activities such as vulgar or obscene language, drunkenness, viewing pornography, gossip, and sexual activity outside of the marriage of one man and one woman.

The Justice Centre previously intervened in this case at the Supreme Court of British Columbia, to argue for the Charter section 2(d) right to freedom of association, including the right of every charity, ethnic and cultural association, sports club, temple, church, and political group to establish its own rules and membership requirements.  On December 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled in favour of Trinity Western, stating that the Law Society’s decision was unreasonable. The Law Society appealed, and the Court of Appeal heard oral argument from the parties in June of 2016.

Share this:

Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree announces the introduction of Bill C-22 on March 12, 2026 (Photo credit: The Canadian Press/Spencer Colby)

Justice Centre launches national petition to stop Bill C-22

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces the launch of a national petition calling...
Digital ID (Courtesy of Montri)

National Post: Liberals have Canada leading the West in state surveillance

Among the western democratic powers, Canada is quickly emerging as a leader in internet regulation and state surveillance. The federal government,...
Lockdowns (Courtesy of Corona Borealis)

New Westminster Times: Fear Led Canadians to Accept Violations of their Charter Rights and Freedoms

Six years ago, in mid-March 2020, Canada’s federal and provincial governments first started restricting our Charter freedoms of association, conscience, religion, peaceful...

Explore Related News

Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree announces the introduction of Bill C-22 on March 12, 2026 (Photo credit: The Canadian Press/Spencer Colby)
Read More
Health care professional (Courtesy of smolaw11)
Read More
Jeff Evely (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)
Read More
Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree announces the introduction of Bill C-22 on March 12, 2026 (Photo credit: The Canadian Press/Spencer Colby)
Health care professional (Courtesy of smolaw11)
Jeff Evely (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)
Grimsby, Ontario (Courtesy of Wikipedia)