Court rules against suicide prevention group, undermining freedom of religion

Share this:

City of Waterloo, Quebec (Photo Credit: Wiki Commons)
City of Waterloo, Quebec (Photo Credit: Wiki Commons)

Court rules against suicide prevention group, undermining freedom of religion

City of Waterloo, Quebec (Photo Credit: Wiki Commons)
City of Waterloo, Quebec (Photo Credit: Wiki Commons)

Share this:

WATERLOO, QC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Municipal Court of Waterloo has upheld the ticketing of a volunteer of the suicide prevention group Le Groupe Jaspe in a decision that undermines freedom of religion in Quebec.

Le Groupe Jaspe was founded in 1999 by Claude Tremblay following the suicide of his son. In an effort to engage with suicidal and desperate people, Mr. Tremblay set out to knock on every door in Quebec’s 1,000 cities and towns. Since then, he and his team of 70 volunteers have reached over 770 towns and villages across Quebec with a message about the value of life.

On October 30, 2024, the City issued a ticket to one of the group’s volunteers for going door-to-door without a permit. The City claimed the activity violated a bylaw requiring a permit for solicitation.

With help from the Justice Centre, Le Groupe Jaspe challenged the application of the bylaw to the volunteer on the grounds that it violated their freedom of religion – protected by section 2(a) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The case was heard by the Municipal Court of Waterloo on February 10, 2025.

The City argued that the legal landscape had shifted since the passing of Quebec’s 2019 Loi sur la Laïcité de l’État (Act Respecting the Laicity of the State), which affirms the state’s religious neutrality.

On May 26, 2025, the Court concluded that the bylaw could be enforced against the volunteer of Le Groupe Jaspe. However, the Court did find that Loi sur la Laïcité de l’État does not provide the state with unlimited power to limit such activities.

Constitutional lawyer Olivier Séguin, who argued the case, expressed disappointment with the ruling.

“This decision suggests that municipalities can suppress peaceful religious expression in the public square through permitting rules—something the Charter is meant to prevent,” said Mr. Séguin. “This ruling stands in tension with prior court decisions that affirmed the right to share one’s faith publicly. It raises serious concerns about the future of religious freedom in Quebec.”

Share this:

The official flag of the Canadian Province of Alberta (Courtesy of Miubewa)

Western Standard: Canada’s judiciary crisis — why woke judges are failing Albertans and threatening justice

Premier Danielle Smith is taking a lot of heat over her proposal that Alberta should have a greater say in...
Alberta Legislature Building in Edmonton, Canada. (Courtesy of Rita Petcu)

Juno News: Alberta Premier Smith has a solid case for demanding judicial change

Canada’s federally appointed judges, and the process by which they are appointed, leave much to be desired. Shortly after becoming Chief...
Brian Jenkins wearing a sandwich board reading “Let us pray for the end of abortion" (Courtesy of Brian Jenkins)

Police fine for displaying non-commercial sandwich board at rally sparks constitutional challenge

SHERBROOKE, PQ: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers are bringing a constitutional challenge on behalf of...

Explore Related News

Brian Jenkins wearing a sandwich board reading “Let us pray for the end of abortion" (Courtesy of Brian Jenkins)
Read More
Public meeting (Courtesy of Wideonet)
Read More
Ontario Provincial Police vehicle (Courtesy of SockaGPhoto)
Read More
Brian Jenkins wearing a sandwich board reading “Let us pray for the end of abortion" (Courtesy of Brian Jenkins)
Public meeting (Courtesy of Wideonet)
Ontario Provincial Police vehicle (Courtesy of SockaGPhoto)
2022 Ottawa Freedom Convoy (Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)