Court upholds Quebec’s unscientific and draconian Covid curfew law

Share this:

Court upholds Quebec’s unscientific and draconian Covid curfew law

Share this:

AMOS, QC: The Justice Centre is disappointed to announce the loss in court of a Charter challenge to Quebec’s curfew lockdown. Justice Mme Marie-France Beaulieu read her ruling aloud on January 30, 2024, in the Courthouse of Amos, in Abitibi municipal region in western Quebec.

The challenge was initiated by Stéphanie Pépin, for whom the Justice Centre provided lawyers over the past three years. On the evening of January 9, 2021, while driving to join a 9:00 p.m. protest against the curfew, Ms. Pépin was stopped by police and ticketed for being in public past the 8:00 p.m. curfew deadline.

The curfew law, which came into effect on January 9, 2021, was brought in by Quebec’s provincial government, led by Premier François Legault. It was one of the harshest lockdown policies in Canada, and Quebec was the only jurisdiction in the country to employ such a measure. It prohibited people from leaving their homes between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 5:00 a.m. Police officers, empowered by the Public Health Act, levied fines against violators ranging from $1,000 to $6,000. The curfew came into force twice, first from January 9, 2021, until May 28, 2021, and then a second time from December 31, 2021, until January 17, 2022.

Ms. Pépin chose to fight the curfew using the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Justice Centre provided lawyers to Ms. Pépin, who challenged certain sections of the Public Health Act as unjustified violations of her constitutional freedoms of expression and peaceful assembly. Her hearing took place September 18-21, 2023.

As a result of a subpoena from lawyers provided by the Justice Centre, the week-long trial featured testimony from Dr. Horacio Arruda, Quebec’s National Director of Public Health during the pandemic, and Dr. Richard Massé, Arruda’s right-hand man and architect of the Public Health Act under which the curfew was enacted.

Lawyer Olivier Séguin, representing Ms. Pépin, stated, “There have been dozens of challenges to the curfew law, but this one was different. This is the first time in Canadian history that the crafters of the laws under scrutiny were questioned under oath, and it became evident they had no constitutional basis on which to act.”

The decision will be appealed.

For media inquiries, please contact lawyer Olivier Séguin at oseguin@jccf.caor at 438-389-2503.

Share this:

Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)

Alberta lawyer asks Court of Appeal to consider excluded arguments in challenge to Law Society rules

CALGARY, AB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that Alberta lawyer Roger Song has asked the Court of Appeal of...
External view of Kamloops Indian Residential School (Courtesy of Wikipedia)

Western Standard: The real threat isn’t residential school ‘denialism’ — it’s censorship

On June 1, the Senate Human Rights Committee passed an amendment to Bill C-9, the Combatting Hate Act, that would make...
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)

Can private conversations lead to human rights penalties? BC court to decide

ABBOTSFORD, BC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will appear before...

Explore Related News

Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)
Read More
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)
Read More
Journalist Cory Morgan adjacent to a public highway (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Read More
Alberta lawyer Roger Song (Courtesy of Roger Song)
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Courtesy of CBC)
Journalist Cory Morgan adjacent to a public highway (Courtesy of Cory Morgan)
Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Aqnus)