Hearing set in constitutional challenge over Parliament Hill censorship of protest signs

Share this:

Members of the Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)
Members of the Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)

Hearing set in constitutional challenge over Parliament Hill censorship of protest signs

Members of the Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)
Members of the Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)

Share this:

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Ontario Superior Court of Justice will hear oral arguments on January 26, 2026, in a case brought by Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) challenging a decision by the Parliamentary Protective Service (PPS) to prohibit the display of certain protest signs on Parliament Hill.

The case stems from a May 2023 press conference, organized by CLC on Parliament Hill ahead of its annual event, the National March for Life. Before the event began, a PPS officer inspected the group’s signs. After  reviewing  them,  the officer prohibited  CLC from displaying images of fetal remains deemed too graphic to be shown on Parliament Hill.

The officer cited Parliament Hill rules banning images deemed “obscene, offensive, or that promote hatred.” A later version of the rules expressly prohibited signs or banners displaying “explicit graphic violence or blood.”

The case raises questions of national importance, as the rule at issue effectively prohibits all images the PPS regards as objectionable.  This restriction affects expression in service of many causes, from anti-war protests to health campaigns to animal rights advocacy.

“Using graphic images to expose injustice has long been a catalyst for social change,” says Matthew Wojciechowski, spokesperson for the CLC.

“Though difficult to look at, images of abortion expose a truth that words cannot. Censoring them on Parliament Hill—the heart of our democracy—reveals a deep hypocrisy and an alarming erosion of freedom of expression,” he added.

Constitutional lawyer Hatim Kheir said, “We look forward to this matter being heard. We hope that the court will agree that the Rules for the Use of Parliament Hill unjustifiably limit the freedom of expression of demonstrators.”

“If there is any place in our country that should be maximally available for people to proclaim a political message, it is Parliament Hill,” he added.

Share this:

Peace Tower (Courtesy of Colin Temple)

Justice Centre submits parliamentary brief on social trust and civic resilience

CALGARY, AB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that President John Carpay has submitted a brief to the...
Benita Pedersen (Courtesy of Benita Pedersen)

Alberta woman faces human rights complaint over flyer opposing rainbow crosswalk

EDMONTON, AB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre are assisting Benita Pedersen, an Alberta...
Christian musician Sean Feucht (Courtesy of CBC)

Quebec City worship cancellation lawsuit moves forward

QUEBEC CITY, QC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a lawsuit filed on behalf of Burn 24/7...

Explore Related News

Peace Tower (Courtesy of Colin Temple)
Read More
Benita Pedersen (Courtesy of Benita Pedersen)
Read More
Christian musician Sean Feucht (Courtesy of CBC)
Read More
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Colin Temple)
Benita Pedersen (Courtesy of Benita Pedersen)
Christian musician Sean Feucht (Courtesy of CBC)
Rural Municipality of Springfield (Courtesy of Daniel Page)