Hearing set in constitutional challenge over Parliament Hill censorship of protest signs

Share this:

Members of the Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)
Members of the Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)

Hearing set in constitutional challenge over Parliament Hill censorship of protest signs

Members of the Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)
Members of the Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)

Share this:

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Ontario Superior Court of Justice will hear oral arguments on January 26, 2026, in a case brought by Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) challenging a decision by the Parliamentary Protective Service (PPS) to prohibit the display of certain protest signs on Parliament Hill.

The case stems from a May 2023 press conference, organized by CLC on Parliament Hill ahead of its annual event, the National March for Life. Before the event began, a PPS officer inspected the group’s signs. After  reviewing  them,  the officer prohibited  CLC from displaying images of fetal remains deemed too graphic to be shown on Parliament Hill.

The officer cited Parliament Hill rules banning images deemed “obscene, offensive, or that promote hatred.” A later version of the rules expressly prohibited signs or banners displaying “explicit graphic violence or blood.”

The case raises questions of national importance, as the rule at issue effectively prohibits all images the PPS regards as objectionable.  This restriction affects expression in service of many causes, from anti-war protests to health campaigns to animal rights advocacy.

“Using graphic images to expose injustice has long been a catalyst for social change,” says Matthew Wojciechowski, spokesperson for the CLC.

“Though difficult to look at, images of abortion expose a truth that words cannot. Censoring them on Parliament Hill—the heart of our democracy—reveals a deep hypocrisy and an alarming erosion of freedom of expression,” he added.

Constitutional lawyer Hatim Kheir said, “We look forward to this matter being heard. We hope that the court will agree that the Rules for the Use of Parliament Hill unjustifiably limit the freedom of expression of demonstrators.”

“If there is any place in our country that should be maximally available for people to proclaim a political message, it is Parliament Hill,” he added.

Share this:

Social media (Courtesy of prima91)

Epoch Times: New digital safety commission will have extensive powers to censor speech on social media

Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, is being sold as a way to protect children from online harms. Everyone...
Moncton City Hall (Courtesy of Naya Na)

Christian ministry sues City of Moncton over cancelled worship event

MONCTON, NB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre have filed a...

New Justice Centre report urges Parliament to reject Bill C-34

CALGARY, AB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms has released a new report warning that Bill C-34, the Safe Social...

Explore Related News

Moncton City Hall (Courtesy of Naya Na)
Read More
Parliament Building on Parliament Hill in Ottawa
Read More
Human rights tribunal (Courtesy of Roy Grogan)
Read More
Moncton City Hall (Courtesy of Naya Na)
Parliament Building on Parliament Hill in Ottawa
Human rights tribunal (Courtesy of Roy Grogan)
Quebec City Convention Centre (Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)