Ontario Human Rights Tribunal urged to reconsider ruling that dismissed student’s faith-based objection to Covid vaccine mandate

Share this:

Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)
Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)

Ontario Human Rights Tribunal urged to reconsider ruling that dismissed student’s faith-based objection to Covid vaccine mandate

Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)
Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)

Share this:

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a request for reconsideration has been filed with the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal (Tribunal) on behalf of former Ontario Tech University (University) student Philip Anisimov, after the Tribunal ruled that his religious objection to the Covid vaccines was not protected as a “creed” under the Ontario Human Rights Code.

Mr. Anisimov, who was studying Engineering at the University, was denied a complete vaccine exemption in 2021, but granted an interim accommodation that allowed him to complete the fall term. In December 2021, lawyers funded by the Justice Centre filed a human rights complaint, arguing that the University’s actions discriminated against him based on religion.

Despite this filing, the University deregistered Mr. Anisimov from his courses in early 2022.

The experience left him uncertain about whether he would ever be allowed to finish his degree, and he ultimately graduated a year late in 2023.

The reconsideration submission maintains that the Tribunal applied an incorrect, “objective” standard to Mr. Anisimov’s religious beliefs, overlooked the discriminatory effect of the University’s vaccine policy, and misinterpreted evidence about other students who were accommodated.

Constitutional lawyer Hatim Kheir said, “By requiring an objective component, people’s religious beliefs become subject to the approval of religious authorities, which is contrary to human rights law.”

“We argue that the decision misapplied some fundamental principles of human rights law, including the principle that people are free to interpret their own religious traditions, so long as their beliefs are sincerely held,” he added.

A response from the University is due November 6, 2025, after which the parties will wait for a decision from the Tribunal.

Share this:

George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)

Major victory for free expression as court strikes down Ontario Ministry of Transportation’s political billboard ban

SUDBURY, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Ontario Divisional Court has ruled that the Ontario...
Censorship (Courtesy of monticellllo)

Epoch Times: Six Bills could drive Canada closer to a surveillance state

Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, is the latest building block to be added to the foundation of Canada’s...
EXCLUSIVE: Jeffrey Evely disposing of ticket after constitutional win (Courtesy of Jeffrey Evely)

Crown withdraws $28,872.50 ticket issued under unconstitutional Nova Scotia “woods ban”

HALIFAX, NS: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Crown has withdrawn the ticket issued to Jeffrey...

Explore Related News

George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)
Read More
EXCLUSIVE: Jeffrey Evely disposing of ticket after constitutional win (Courtesy of Jeffrey Evely)
Read More
Frances Widdowson (Courtesy of Wyatt Claypool)
Read More
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)
EXCLUSIVE: Jeffrey Evely disposing of ticket after constitutional win (Courtesy of Jeffrey Evely)
Frances Widdowson (Courtesy of Wyatt Claypool)
Evan Blackman and his son at a hockey game (Courtesy Evan Blackman)