Ontario Human Rights Tribunal urged to reconsider ruling that dismissed student’s faith-based objection to Covid vaccine mandate

Share this:

Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)
Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)

Ontario Human Rights Tribunal urged to reconsider ruling that dismissed student’s faith-based objection to Covid vaccine mandate

Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)
Philip Anisimov (Courtesy of Philip Anisimov)

Share this:

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a request for reconsideration has been filed with the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal (Tribunal) on behalf of former Ontario Tech University (University) student Philip Anisimov, after the Tribunal ruled that his religious objection to the Covid vaccines was not protected as a “creed” under the Ontario Human Rights Code.

Mr. Anisimov, who was studying Engineering at the University, was denied a complete vaccine exemption in 2021, but granted an interim accommodation that allowed him to complete the fall term. In December 2021, lawyers funded by the Justice Centre filed a human rights complaint, arguing that the University’s actions discriminated against him based on religion.

Despite this filing, the University deregistered Mr. Anisimov from his courses in early 2022.

The experience left him uncertain about whether he would ever be allowed to finish his degree, and he ultimately graduated a year late in 2023.

The reconsideration submission maintains that the Tribunal applied an incorrect, “objective” standard to Mr. Anisimov’s religious beliefs, overlooked the discriminatory effect of the University’s vaccine policy, and misinterpreted evidence about other students who were accommodated.

Constitutional lawyer Hatim Kheir said, “By requiring an objective component, people’s religious beliefs become subject to the approval of religious authorities, which is contrary to human rights law.”

“We argue that the decision misapplied some fundamental principles of human rights law, including the principle that people are free to interpret their own religious traditions, so long as their beliefs are sincerely held,” he added.

A response from the University is due November 6, 2025, after which the parties will wait for a decision from the Tribunal.

Share this:

Surveillance (Courtesy of Gorodenkoff)

Epoch Times: ‘Grave Threat to Privacy’: Resistance to Lawful Access Bill Mounts

Why do Canadians cherish privacy in the first place? If a person has nothing to hide, why should they care...
Dr. John Robson delivers the Justice Centre's national petition opposing Bill C-22 to the Prime Minister of Canada (Courtesy of Dr. John Robson)

42,344 Canadians call on Parliament to stop Bill C-22 surveillance legislation

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that it has delivered a national petition signed by...
Human Rights tribunal (Courtesy of Roy Grogan)

Epoch Times: Human rights laws should respect the human right to speak freely

Human rights legislation in Canada was originally passed to narrowly address discrimination in areas such as employment, housing, and services....

Explore Related News

Dr. John Robson delivers the Justice Centre's national petition opposing Bill C-22 to the Prime Minister of Canada (Courtesy of Dr. John Robson)
Read More
Matt and Nicole Alexander (Courtesy of Alexander family)
Read More
Disciplinary committee meeting (Courtesy of C Monk)
Read More
Dr. John Robson delivers the Justice Centre's national petition opposing Bill C-22 to the Prime Minister of Canada (Courtesy of Dr. John Robson)
Matt and Nicole Alexander (Courtesy of Alexander family)
Disciplinary committee meeting (Courtesy of C Monk)
Correctional facility (Courtesy of Jeffrey Zalesny)