Justice Centre urges Committee to pass Bill S-217 (detention in custody) to ensure that judges can protect the public

Share this:

Justice Centre urges Committee to pass Bill S-217 (detention in custody) to ensure that judges can protect the public

Share this:

OTTAWA: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF.ca) will appear before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights this Tuesday, April 11, to present its recommendations regarding Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody).

The Justice Centre’s Litigation Director, Jay Cameron, will appear before the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights between 3:30 P.M. and 5:30 P.M. in Centre Block, Room 237-C.

Other witnesses include Cheryl Webster, Associate Professor, University of Ottawa, Anthony N. Doob, Professor, University of Toronto and Nancy Irving, Barrister and Solicitor.

Bill S-217 (“Wynn’s law”) was tabled before the Senate in February 2016 by Senator Bob Runciman in response to the slaying of RCMP Constable David Wynn by career criminal Shawn Rehn, who was out on bail at the time at the time of the killing on January 17, 2015.  This Act amends the Criminal Code so as to require that the criminal record of the accused, if one exists, be put before the judge who is considering the bail hearing.

The Justice Centre will recommend to the Committee that Bill S-217 be enacted, to better ensure the rights and freedoms of Canadians are guaranteed by the judicial process. The Justice Centre’s Brief to Parliament concludes:

The amendment to section 518(1)(c) as proposed in Bill S-217 prevents human prosecutorial error by requiring that the physical paper record of an accused is presented at a bail hearing 100% of the time. The introduction of the accused’s record at a bail hearing is universally in the best interests of the Canadian public and the judiciary. The mandatory introduction of the record is also required to protect the Charter rights of accused persons themselves, both so that they may be aware of the case against them and any errors in the alleged record, as well as so they may have the benefit of the record before an impartial judge.

Share this:

Do not enter (Courtesy of Adobe Stock)

Western Standard: From fire prevention to freedom violation — inside the court decision that rebuked Nova Scotia government

In August 2025, the Nova Scotia government prohibited all activities across three-quarters of the province on the pretext of preventing...
Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)

Quebec woman faces disciplinary complaint for helping couples with Christian counselling

MONTREAL, QC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre are assisting Maryse...
Jeff Evely, who received a $28,000 ticket for walking in the woods during the summer of 2025 (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)

Epoch Times: Court Ruling on Nova Scotia’s ‘Woods Ban’ a Victory for Freedom

Our ancient right to move about freely was affirmed and vindicated by the Nova Scotia Supreme Court on April 17,...

Explore Related News

Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)
Read More
Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa (Courtesy of Iryna)
Read More
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Deyan)
Read More
Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)
Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa (Courtesy of Iryna)
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Deyan)
Jeff Evely (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)