Lindsay Shepherd testifies before Parliament today to share her perspective on “online hate”

Share this:

Lindsay Shepherd testifies before Parliament today to share her perspective on “online hate”

Share this:

Lindsay Shepherd, Campus Free Speech Fellow with the Justice Centre, will testify today before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights as it studies the issue of “online hate” in Canada. The Standing Committee opened this study following the Christchurch mosque shootings in New Zealand that killed 51 people.

This hearing is open to the public and starts at 8:45 a.m. in room 405 of the Wellington Building, 197 Sparks Street. Ms. Shepherd will be joined by historian, author and filmmaker, John W. Robson, and by noted political and social commentator Mark Steyn.

Ms. Shepherd will provide insight to the Committee based on the unique experiences she gained during her university studies. Lindsay, who has a Master of Arts in Cultural Analysis and Social Theory from Wilfrid Laurier University, became well known in Canada and abroad after she was subjected to intimidation, bullying and reprimands by her professors for having shown her pupils a segment of a television debate about gender neutral pronouns featuring Dr. Jordan B. Peterson.  She was the recipient of the 2018 Outstanding Graduate Student Award from Heterodox Academy and the 2018 Harry Weldon Canadian Values Award from the Peace, Order and Good Government think tank.

Ms. Shepherd’s testimony comes not long after the submission of a report to the same Committee, which was prepared by the Justice Centre to benefit Parliamentarians as they examine the issue of “online hate” in Canada. This report, Hate or Disagreement? Respecting Charter-protected freedom of expression in a digital world, implores Parliamentarians to tread carefully when redefining the line between Criminal hatred and free expression:

In order to preserve Canada’s liberal democracy, federal and provincial governments must pay closer attention to their constitutional obligations. The intent to protect the constitutional right of freedom of expression must begin to be “fundamental” to governments, not an afterthought, or an inconvenience.

Share this:

Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa (Courtesy of Iryna)

City of Ottawa bylaw faces legal warning and potential court challenge

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre have issued a...
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Deyan)

Court to decide if prorogation challenge is now moot

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers will appear before the Federal Court of Appeal...
Jeff Evely (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)

Supreme Court of Nova Scotia strikes down province’s woods ban as unconstitutional

HALIFAX, NS: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia has struck...

Explore Related News

Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa (Courtesy of Iryna)
Read More
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Deyan)
Read More
Jeff Evely (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)
Read More
Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa (Courtesy of Iryna)
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Deyan)
Jeff Evely (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)
UBC campus sign (Courtesy of Jeff Whyte)