NEWS RELEASE: University of Victoria urged to protect freedom of expression on its campus

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

NEWS RELEASE: University of Victoria urged to protect freedom of expression on its campus

Share this:

VICTORIA: The Justice Centre has written to the University of Victoria (UVic) requesting that UVic adhere to its policies in upholding the rule of law on campus and disciplining students that attempt to censor opinions they disagree with through vandalism.

Youth Protecting Youth (YPY), a registered student club is “a group of undergraduate students from the University of Victoria who share a common love and respect for all human life, without regard for gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, level of development, or physical capabilities.”

On the morning of November 16, 2017, YPY members erected a display in an area of the UVic campus known as the “Quad”, consisting of 10,000 small blue and pink flags planted into the ground. The flags represent the approximately 100,000 abortions that occur in Canada annually. The purpose of this and other similar flag displays are to raise awareness of the fact that Canada has no law regulating abortion. YPY had emailed Campus Security to notify them of the event on November 15.

At about noon, UVic students began to gather to protest the display. The protest became larger as time went on, increasing in number and intensity. At approximately 1:30 pm, the crowd of protesting students grew to approximately 30 individuals. Some of the protesting students became verbally aggressive and told YPY members that they would remove the flags themselves if YPY refused to do so. Concerned about the protesting students’ threats, YPY called Campus Security. Many protesting students then began pulling up the flags and putting them in piles.

As the protesters began to destroy the flag display, two Campus Security officers arrived, but declined to take any action. The officers simply watched as the protesters dismantled YPY members’ flag display. The officers explained to YPY members that they must remain “neutral” and that they could not take any action to protect the flag display because it could be interpreted as Campus Security taking a position in support of YPY. The officers further explained that intervention could “escalate” the situation.

Unopposed, the protesters completely destroyed the display.

The Justice Centre’s letter explains that, Campus Security’s claim that if it acted to protect the flag display from student vandalism, it would not be viewed as “neutral” represents a gross misunderstanding of the legal duties of Campus Security to protect the property of students and to respond to violations of UVic’s policies. Campus Security’s job is to uphold the rule of law on campus—which includes protecting student expression—not stand idly by while a mob of bullies vandalize an approved student display.

YPY has been approved to erect the same flag display on February 22, 2018. In its letter, the Justice Centre requests that, if students threaten to vandalize or disrupt the event on February 22, UVic adhere to its policies and procedures, including protecting free expression on campus and disciplining students that engage in censorship through vandalism.

“This will result in a safer and more welcoming learning environment, where students with “unpopular” views can express their opinions,” explained Justice Centre president John Carpay.  “Universities should be supporting free speech and vigorous debate, not condoning its censorship,” continued Carpay.

Share this:

AI chatbot (Courtesy of Zetha Work)

Epoch Times: Bill C-34’s AI provisions put privacy and access to information at risk

What happens when AI chatbot companies become intermediaries between users and law enforcement? Follow the incentives, discover the outcomes. Ottawa’s new...
Joffre Lakes Park (Courtesy of Daniel Avram)

Race-based closures at Joffre Lakes Park draw constitutional warning

VANCOUVER, BC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre have sent a...
Children online (Courtesy of Suzi Media)

Epoch Times: A Social Media Ban for Minors Requires Data From Everyone

In debating a social media ban for minors, it appears we face a choice between two perceived harms. One is...

Explore Related News

Joffre Lakes Park (Courtesy of Daniel Avram)
Read More
Census data (Courtesy of Rosinka79)
Read More
2023 Campaign Life Coalition event (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)
Read More
Joffre Lakes Park (Courtesy of Daniel Avram)
Census data (Courtesy of Rosinka79)
2023 Campaign Life Coalition event (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)
UBC campus sign (Courtesy of Jeff Whyte)