Nurse Amy Hamm fights for her freedom of expression before BC Nurse Disciplinary Panel

Share this:

Nurse Amy Hamm fights for her freedom of expression before BC Nurse Disciplinary Panel

Share this:

BRITISH COLUMBIA: The Justice Centre announces that the hearing for Vancouver area nurse Amy Hamm began today at the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives (BCCNM). An investigation was launched by the BCCNM in November, 2020, in response to public complaints about Ms. Hamm’s ‘gender critical’ opinions and comments. This followed her involvement with an “I JK Rowling” billboard display in Vancouver, endorsing Ms. Rowling’s view that women and girls deserve their own safe bathrooms and locker rooms where biological males may not enter.

In Ms. Hamm’s case, the BCCNM Inquiry Committee referred the matter to a Disciplinary Panel. A hearing was originally set for spring of 2022, but was adjourned to today’s date. The charge against Ms. Hamm reads: “Between approximately July 2018 and March 2021, you made discriminatory and derogatory statements regarding transgender people, while identifying yourself as a nurse or nurse educator. These statements were made across various online platforms, including but not limited to, podcasts, videos, published writings and social media.”

The hearing is being conducted by videoconference, from September 21 to 23 and October 24 to 27, 2022.

The Justice Centre is concerned that regulatory bodies across Canada are increasingly policing the speech of professionals with threats of disciplinary action. “The College is tasked with keeping patients safe and regulating the profession in the public interest. Their job is not to give social justice activists a tool for ‘cancelling’ people with whom they do not agree or who have opinions outside of a narrow orthodoxy,” says lawyer Lisa Bildy, co-counsel for Ms. Hamm.

“Professional governing bodies are created by statute and are therefore subject to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Freedom of speech, thought, belief, opinion and expression are Charter rights belonging to all people, even health professionals,” Ms. Bildy adds.

“This case will set an important precedent for regulated professionals who engage in the public square in policy debates which may be contentious, as it seems virtually everything is in these times,” concludes Ms. Bildy.

Share this:

Supreme Court of Canada (Courtesy of Google Maps)

New Westminster Times: Notwithstanding: John Carpay on Woke Judges & Section 33 of the Charter

The Supreme Court of Canada has now finished listening to arguments from the federal government about watering down section 33...
Photo of Dr. Widdowson (Courtesy of an anonymous contributor)

Complaint filed after police failed to respond to repeated 911 calls during violent confrontation at University of Winnipeg

WINNIPEG, MB: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a complaint has been filed with Manitoba’s Law...
Surveillance (Courtesy of ImageFlow)

Western Standard: Ottawa froze protesters’ bank accounts — now Ottawa wants your phone records

Like many expansions of government power, Bill C-22 (dubbed the Lawful Access Act) arrives dressed in reassuring bureaucratic language....

Explore Related News

Photo of Dr. Widdowson (Courtesy of an anonymous contributor)
Read More
Rural Municipality of Springfield, Manitoba (Courtesy of Daniel Page)
Read More
Geoffrey Horsman (Courtesy of Geoffrey Horsman
Read More
Photo of Dr. Widdowson (Courtesy of an anonymous contributor)
Rural Municipality of Springfield, Manitoba (Courtesy of Daniel Page)
Geoffrey Horsman (Courtesy of Geoffrey Horsman
Justice Centre report