Women’s rights group seeks Court approval to challenge policy allowing biological males in women’s prisons

Share this:

Correctional facility (Courtesy of Jeffrey Zalesny)
Correctional facility (Courtesy of Jeffrey Zalesny)

Women’s rights group seeks Court approval to challenge policy allowing biological males in women’s prisons

Correctional facility (Courtesy of Jeffrey Zalesny)
Correctional facility (Courtesy of Jeffrey Zalesny)

Share this:

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers have filed a motion for public interest standing on behalf of Canadian Women’s Sex-Based Rights (CAWSBAR). The motion seeks the Court’s recognition that CAWSBAR is the appropriate party to advance a landmark constitutional challenge to the federal government’s practice of placing trans-identifying male inmates in women’s prisons. The lawsuit seeks to protect incarcerated women who might not feel safe challenging this policy, given the potential for institutional consequences or effects on their parole.

If granted, public interest standing will confirm CAWSBAR’s ability to pursue litigation on behalf of incarcerated women who are afraid that bringing their own claim would result in institutional repercussions or prejudicing their parole review.

Constitutional lawyer Chris Fleury said, “No woman should be at risk of abuse or violence at the hands of a man while they are serving a sentence in a federal institution. Granting standing to CAWSBAR will give a voice to women who have been silenced by a fear of reprisal.” 

The underlying lawsuit challenges Correctional Service Canada’s Directive 100: Gender Diverse Offenders, which authorizes the placement of trans-identifying male inmates in women’s correctional facilities even when no surgery has occurred.  

CAWSBAR argues that this practice violates the Charter rights of female inmates, including their section 7 right to life, liberty and security of the person, their section 12 right not to be subjected to cruel and unusual treatment, and their section 15 right to equality as female persons. The lawsuit also relies on section 28 of the Charter, which guarantees that all Charter freedoms apply equally to men and women. 

Further updates on the case are expected in early 2026.

Share this:

Do not enter (Courtesy of Adobe Stock)

Western Standard: From fire prevention to freedom violation — inside the court decision that rebuked Nova Scotia government

In August 2025, the Nova Scotia government prohibited all activities across three-quarters of the province on the pretext of preventing...
Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)

Quebec woman faces disciplinary complaint for helping couples with Christian counselling

MONTREAL, QC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre are assisting Maryse...
Jeff Evely, who received a $28,000 ticket for walking in the woods during the summer of 2025 (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)

Epoch Times: Court Ruling on Nova Scotia’s ‘Woods Ban’ a Victory for Freedom

Our ancient right to move about freely was affirmed and vindicated by the Nova Scotia Supreme Court on April 17,...

Explore Related News

Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)
Read More
Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa (Courtesy of Iryna)
Read More
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Deyan)
Read More
Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)
Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa (Courtesy of Iryna)
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Deyan)
Jeff Evely (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)