Justice Centre in court over McMaster University removing students refusing Covid shot

Share this:

Justice Centre in court over McMaster University removing students refusing Covid shot

Share this:

HAMILTON: The Justice Centre appeared in Court last week challenging McMaster University’s decision to remove four students from university programs because they decided against taking the Covid-19 vaccine. The Justice Centre represents two doctoral students, an MBA student at the DeGroote School of Business, and an Honours Biochemistry undergraduate student. A two-day hearing took place March 16 – 17, 2022 before a panel of three judges of the Ontario Divisional Court.

McMaster introduced a mandatory vaccination policy effective September 7, 2021. The policy requires all students, and employees, to take two doses of approved Covid-19 vaccines or face sanctions. Students were permitted to request exemptions to the mandatory vaccination policy, which were considered by the Equity and Inclusion Office. Some students were not told they would be withdrawn from their programs until after their exemption requests were submitted to McMaster.

The available Covid-19 vaccines are known to have been tested using a cell-line known as HEK-293, which McMaster’s own vaccine FAQ website states “are replications of tissue from elective abortions that happened 30 to 60 years ago.” The students requested exemptions from McMaster’s mandatory vaccination policy on religious and conscience grounds, however McMaster refused their exemption requests, claiming that there was no connection between the students’ religious beliefs and their refusal to receive the Covid-19 vaccine.

“McMaster’s decisions to potentially destroy the academic and future professional careers of these bright and promising students was heavy-handed and cruel. These students are honest, intelligent and sincere in their beliefs. We asked the Court to find that the University’s decision was unreasonable and that the process leading to it was unfair,” says Jorge Pineda, a lawyer at the Justice Centre.

“The four students are all devout Catholics or Orthodox Christians who, according to their faith, are obligated to avoid condoning or benefitting from abortion. While others may come to a different conclusion, these students’ religious beliefs require them to decline vaccination. McMaster’s claim that these students’ exemption requests have no nexus with their religious beliefs is absurd,” adds Justice Centre lawyer, Rob Kittredge.

The Courts’ decision as to whether McMaster’s decision should be upheld will be released in the near future. Meanwhile, on March 25, 2022, McMaster University announced that it is suspending its vaccine policy and masking requirements as of May 1, 2022.

Share this:

Youth and social media (Courtesy of pixarno)

Western Standard: Safe Social Media Act is a trojan horse for mass digital surveillance and censorship

The federal government presents Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, as legislation to protect children from online harms. While that...
Public meeting (Courtesy of Tzido)

Court to hear Charter challenge over North Huron trespass notices

GODERICH, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will appear before...
Social media (Courtesy of prima91)

Epoch Times: New digital safety commission will have extensive powers to censor speech on social media

Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, is being sold as a way to protect children from online harms. Everyone...

Explore Related News

Public meeting (Courtesy of Tzido)
Read More
Moncton City Hall (Courtesy of Naya Na)
Read More
Parliament Building on Parliament Hill in Ottawa
Read More
Public meeting (Courtesy of Tzido)
Moncton City Hall (Courtesy of Naya Na)
Parliament Building on Parliament Hill in Ottawa
Human rights tribunal (Courtesy of Roy Grogan)