Victory for Charter freedoms as federal government abandons compelled speech in Canada Summer Jobs attestation

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

Victory for Charter freedoms as federal government abandons compelled speech in Canada Summer Jobs attestation

Share this:

On December 7, the federal government abandoned its 2018 requirement that applicants for Canada Summer Jobs funding express their support for the Government’s position on “reproductive rights” by attesting to the following statement:

Both the job and my organization’s core mandate respect individual human rights in Canada, and the values underlying the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as other rights. These include reproductive rights and the right to be free from discrimination on the basis of sex, religion, race, national or ethnic origin, colour, mental or physical disability or sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression. 

The Justice Centre filed an application challenging the 2018 attestation requirement in April of 2018, on behalf of small business owners Rhea Lynne and William Anderson, seeking a court declaration that compelled speech and compelled ideological conformity violate the Charter

“By removing the requirement that applicants for Canada Summer Jobs agree with a particular position on abortion, the 2019 attestation appears to be a significant improvement.  The 2018 attestation prevented thousands of Canadian businesses from providing employment opportunities for young people this past summer,” stated Justice Centre president John Carpay.

The 2019 CSJ application states that an applicant organization’s summer job program could be deemed “ineligible” if it is considered to:

– restrict access to programs, services, or employment, or otherwise discriminate, contrary to applicable laws, on the basis of prohibited grounds, including sex, genetic characteristics, religion, race, national or ethnic origin, colour, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression;
– advocate intolerance, discrimination and/or prejudice; or
– actively work to undermine or restrict a woman’s access to sexual and reproductive health services.


“The Government has not defined specifically which programs will be deemed “ineligible” under the new criteria,” stated Carpay. “Without an accompanying 2019 CSJ Application Guide, it is impossible to assess how the new criteria will be defined and interpreted.  On its face, the language contained in the attestation could be interpreted to restrict funding from a vast array of charities and non-profit groups which advocate views that the Trudeau Government disagrees with,” continued Carpay.

Share this:

Youth and social media (Courtesy of pixarno)

Western Standard: Safe Social Media Act is a trojan horse for mass digital surveillance and censorship

The federal government presents Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, as legislation to protect children from online harms. While that...
Public meeting (Courtesy of Tzido)

Court to hear Charter challenge over North Huron trespass notices

GODERICH, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre will appear before...
Social media (Courtesy of prima91)

Epoch Times: New digital safety commission will have extensive powers to censor speech on social media

Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, is being sold as a way to protect children from online harms. Everyone...

Explore Related News

Public meeting (Courtesy of Tzido)
Read More
Moncton City Hall (Courtesy of Naya Na)
Read More
Parliament Building on Parliament Hill in Ottawa
Read More
Public meeting (Courtesy of Tzido)
Moncton City Hall (Courtesy of Naya Na)
Parliament Building on Parliament Hill in Ottawa
Human rights tribunal (Courtesy of Roy Grogan)