Justice Centre brings appeal for access to health to Supreme Court of Canada

Share this:

Justice Centre brings appeal for access to health to Supreme Court of Canada

Share this:

The Justice Centre has filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of Canada in Allen v. Alberta, a constitutional challenge to the government’s monopoly over health care.

On September 9, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its decision in Allen v. Alberta, a constitutional challenge to the government’s health care monopoly and its painful waiting lists.  The Court rejected the Charter challenge brought by Darcy Allen, a dentist from Okotoks, Alberta, who waited for years in a state of constant, debilitating pain for necessary back surgery.

The Justice Centre argues that the Alberta courts have failed to apply the Supreme Court of Canada precedent in Chaoulli v. Quebec, in which the Court ruled that access to a waiting list is not access to health care.

“The Court ignored the evidence that many patients in Alberta are on waiting lists for surgery, and many of those patients, like Darcy Allen, suffer severe pain for years.  This evidence was substantially similar to the evidence before the Supreme Court of Canada in the Chaoulli decision, which struck down Quebec’s ban on private health insurance. Further, the Alberta law challenged by Darcy Allen is almost identical to the Quebec law struck down in Chaoulli,” stated Justice Centre president John Carpay, who has represented Dr. Allen since 2009.

Dr. Darcy Allen practised as a dentist in Okotoks, Alberta, until severe and continuous back pain forced him to stop working.  Dr. Allen suffered in pain for years on waiting lists in the government’s health care monopoly until he finally added another mortgage to his house to pay for the medically necessary surgery in Montana.

Dr. Allen seeks to extend to Alberta the 2005 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Chaoulli v. Quebec, which held that “access to a waiting list is not access to health care.”  In Chaoulli, the Supreme Court noted that painful and sometimes deadly waiting lists for patients, in combination with laws that effectively prohibit access to basic medical services outside the government’s monopoly, violate the Charter rights to life and security of the person.

Read more about Allen v. Alberta

Share this:

Do not enter (Courtesy of Adobe Stock)

Western Standard: From fire prevention to freedom violation — inside the court decision that rebuked Nova Scotia government

In August 2025, the Nova Scotia government prohibited all activities across three-quarters of the province on the pretext of preventing...
Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)

Quebec woman faces disciplinary complaint for helping couples with Christian counselling

MONTREAL, QC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers funded by the Justice Centre are assisting Maryse...
Jeff Evely, who received a $28,000 ticket for walking in the woods during the summer of 2025 (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)

Epoch Times: Court Ruling on Nova Scotia’s ‘Woods Ban’ a Victory for Freedom

Our ancient right to move about freely was affirmed and vindicated by the Nova Scotia Supreme Court on April 17,...

Explore Related News

Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)
Read More
Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa (Courtesy of Iryna)
Read More
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Deyan)
Read More
Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun (Courtesy of Maryse Gaudet-Lebrun)
Ottawa City Hall, Ottawa (Courtesy of Iryna)
Peace Tower (Courtesy of Deyan)
Jeff Evely (Courtesy of Jeff Evely)