Hearing set in constitutional challenge over Parliament Hill censorship of protest signs

Share this:

Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill in 2023 (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)
Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill in 2023 (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)

Hearing set in constitutional challenge over Parliament Hill censorship of protest signs

Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill in 2023 (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)
Campaign Life Coalition on Parliament Hill in 2023 (Courtesy of Campaign Life Coalition)

Share this:

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the Ontario Superior Court of Justice will hear oral arguments on Thursday, March 5, 2026, in a case brought by Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) challenging a decision by the Parliamentary Protective Service (PPS) to prohibit the display of certain protest signs on Parliament Hill.

The case stems from a May 2023 press conference, organized by CLC on Parliament Hill ahead of its annual event, the National March for Life. Before the event began, a PPS officer inspected the group’s signs. After reviewing them, the officer prohibited CLC from displaying images of fetal remains deemed too graphic to be shown on Parliament Hill.

The officer cited Parliament Hill rules banning images deemed “obscene, offensive, or that promote hatred.” A later version of the rules expressly prohibited signs or banners displaying “explicit graphic violence or blood.”

The case raises questions of national importance, as the rule at issue effectively prohibits all images the PPS regards as objectionable.  This restriction affects expression in service of many causes, from anti-war protests to health campaigns to animal rights advocacy.

“Using graphic images to expose injustice has long been a catalyst for social change,” says Matthew Wojciechowski, spokesperson for the CLC.

“Though difficult to look at, images of abortion expose a truth that words cannot. Censoring them on Parliament Hill—the heart of our democracy—reveals a deep hypocrisy and an alarming erosion of freedom of expression,” he added.

Constitutional lawyer Hatim Kheir said, “We look forward to this matter being heard. We hope that the court will agree that the Rules for the Use of Parliament Hill unjustifiably limit the freedom of expression of demonstrators.”

“If there is any place in our country that should be maximally available for people to proclaim a political message, it is Parliament Hill,” he added.

Share this:

Lockdowns

Juno News: The sixth anniversary of lockdowns & how fear undermined our ability to think

The power of fear, as a tool for manipulation and control, should not be underestimated. In mid-March 2020, Canada’s federal and...
Grimsby, Ontario (Courtesy of Wikipedia)

Grimsby councillor files second human rights complaint against critics

GRIMSBY, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers have filed responses on behalf of two Grimsby...
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)

Ontario man challenges government censorship of Covid billboard as case awaits hearing date

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a challenge brought by Ontario resident George Katerberg...

Explore Related News

Grimsby, Ontario (Courtesy of Wikipedia)
Read More
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)
Read More
Evan Blackman (Courtesy of Evan Blackman)
Read More
Grimsby, Ontario (Courtesy of Wikipedia)
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)
Evan Blackman (Courtesy of Evan Blackman)
School teacher (Courtesy of Crystal Madsen)