Victory for Charter freedoms as federal government abandons compelled speech in Canada Summer Jobs attestation

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

Victory for Charter freedoms as federal government abandons compelled speech in Canada Summer Jobs attestation

Share this:

On December 7, the federal government abandoned its 2018 requirement that applicants for Canada Summer Jobs funding express their support for the Government’s position on “reproductive rights” by attesting to the following statement:

Both the job and my organization’s core mandate respect individual human rights in Canada, and the values underlying the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as other rights. These include reproductive rights and the right to be free from discrimination on the basis of sex, religion, race, national or ethnic origin, colour, mental or physical disability or sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression. 

The Justice Centre filed an application challenging the 2018 attestation requirement in April of 2018, on behalf of small business owners Rhea Lynne and William Anderson, seeking a court declaration that compelled speech and compelled ideological conformity violate the Charter

“By removing the requirement that applicants for Canada Summer Jobs agree with a particular position on abortion, the 2019 attestation appears to be a significant improvement.  The 2018 attestation prevented thousands of Canadian businesses from providing employment opportunities for young people this past summer,” stated Justice Centre president John Carpay.

The 2019 CSJ application states that an applicant organization’s summer job program could be deemed “ineligible” if it is considered to:

– restrict access to programs, services, or employment, or otherwise discriminate, contrary to applicable laws, on the basis of prohibited grounds, including sex, genetic characteristics, religion, race, national or ethnic origin, colour, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression;
– advocate intolerance, discrimination and/or prejudice; or
– actively work to undermine or restrict a woman’s access to sexual and reproductive health services.


“The Government has not defined specifically which programs will be deemed “ineligible” under the new criteria,” stated Carpay. “Without an accompanying 2019 CSJ Application Guide, it is impossible to assess how the new criteria will be defined and interpreted.  On its face, the language contained in the attestation could be interpreted to restrict funding from a vast array of charities and non-profit groups which advocate views that the Trudeau Government disagrees with,” continued Carpay.

Share this:

Grimsby, Ontario (Courtesy of Wikipedia)

Grimsby councillor files second human rights complaint against critics

GRIMSBY, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that lawyers have filed responses on behalf of two Grimsby...
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)

Ontario man challenges government censorship of Covid billboard as case awaits hearing date

TORONTO, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a challenge brought by Ontario resident George Katerberg...
Vancouver, British Columbia (Courtesy of heyengel)

Western Standard: Reconciliation or Apartheid 2.0? How Canada’s race-based land pact threatens equality before the law

Rights Recognition Agreement signed in secret between the Musqueam Indian Band and Canada’s federal government recognizes Musqueam...

Explore Related News

Grimsby, Ontario (Courtesy of Wikipedia)
Read More
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)
Read More
Evan Blackman (Courtesy of Evan Blackman)
Read More
Grimsby, Ontario (Courtesy of Wikipedia)
George Katerberg's billboard (Courtesy of George Katerberg)
Evan Blackman (Courtesy of Evan Blackman)
School teacher (Courtesy of Crystal Madsen)